My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE - Batch D
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE - Batch D
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2018 4:03:37 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:20:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Misc.
Document_Date
3/6/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I rack n <br />From: Jan Wostmann <jw@efn.org> <br />Sera: Thursday, February 01, 2018 10:51 PM <br />To: GIOELLO Nick R <br />Cc: Susan Hoffman; Kathleen Masterson <br />Subject: PDT 17-1 <br />Attachments: Notice to Correct 012318 pdf <br />Hi Nick, <br />The Capital Hill PUD Response Committee met this evening and they asked that I send the following questions to you. <br />1. I'm attaching the Notice to Correct dated January 23, 2018 from Phillip Hubbard, Code Compliance Inspector, <br />regarding 2855 Capital Drive. <br />Please enter it into the record for PDT 17-1. The question is how does this Notice to Correct affect the current state of <br />the Capitol Hill PUD application? <br />2. The Title Report that is part of the application is about a year old. <br />A committee member mentioned that in real estate matters, title reports that are more than 90 days old must be <br />refreshed. The question: How long does the City consider a title report to be valid? For instance, the Notice to Correct <br />is surely an encumbrance on that particular lot, but does not appear in the title report. <br />3. This last point is more statement than question. Paul Conte is NOT a member of the Capital Hill PUD Response <br />Committee. As an interested party, he may of course enter anything he wishes into the record for PDT 17-1. However, <br />his tone and general lack of civility toward City staff is not shared by any member of the Response Committee. Feel free <br />to share this last point with Scott Gillespie. <br />Thanks, <br />Jan wostmann <br />Laurel Hill Valley Citizens <br />S <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.