Hi Nick. Below are 5 questions that one of our Response Committee members has for you. Some of <br />them emanate from the 9/1/17 meeting in your office with you, Eric from Public Works, Nate, Faris, <br />CW, Cathy, Paul Conte, our traffic engineer Massoud (on the phone) and me. <br />1. Since they share the same travel lane, will the increase in vehicle, pedestrian and other non- <br />motorized users, generated from the PUD, present more conflict and risk on Capital Drive and Spring <br />Blvd, versus scenarios where pedestrians and others are separated, e..g., by having a sidewalk to <br />use? (Paul asked this question) <br />2. Nick indicated he would explore, as possible condition of any possible approval, requiring the <br />developer to perform and record a road condition assessment survey before construction begins, in <br />the interest of holding the developer responsible for restoring the roads to pre-construction <br />conditions. <br />3. Is the current roadway designed and constructed for 80,000 vehicles per the Eugene Fire <br />Code? (Paul) <br />4. Will the City include, as a condition of any possible approval, that Capital Drive and Spring Blvd, <br />need to be kept open to traffic at all times during construction of the PUD? (Massoud) <br />5. What is the assumed distance used to define and study "adjacent and nearby" as referenced in <br />Cirteria 5, (b). ? <br />I believe that Faris & CW were going to send to you "for the record" an audio copy of our 9/1/17 <br />meeting minutes plus a hard copy with various questions highlighted in blue ink. If you still need <br />these copies please let me know and Cathy Johnson or i will see that you get them ASAP. <br />Also, as you know, we are awaiting the referral comments from Public Works and the Fire Dept. Do <br />you have any idea when we might be receiving them and any other referral comments that may still <br />be outstanding?? <br />Thanks as always for your assistance. <br />2 <br />