My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE - Batch C
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE - Batch C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2018 4:02:57 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:19:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Misc.
Document_Date
3/6/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Below is an email that I sent Nick and Mark Dahl a couple weeks ago that I have yet to receive a response to. Faris asked <br />that I forward to you for centralized management. <br />Thanks so much, CW Murchison <br />Forwarded message <br />From- C Murchison <cwmurchisonagmail. com> <br />Date: Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:44 PM <br />Subject: CHPUD Questions about emergency access. <br />To: GIOELLO Nick R <Nick. R.GioelloP_ci.eugene.or.us>, mark.h.dahl(dci.eugene.or.us <br />Cc: Faris <fcassell(@comcast.net> <br />Good Afternoon, <br />I'm writing concerning a few questions that we, the CHPUD Response Team, have about the current and possible future <br />emergency access routes to the CHPUD site. If this message could be forwarded to Eric Favreau in Public Works, that <br />would be very much appreciated. <br />Nick, in your earlier emails with Faris, you indicated that the Fire Department and Public Works were discussing the safety <br />problems of the emergency access routes to the top of Capital Hill, as noted in Mark Dahl's 3/27/17 letter in response to <br />the CHPUD application_ <br />Q1. Are the current discussions between the Fire Department and Public works only concerning current safety problems, <br />or are they also discussing how those safety problems would be exacerbated by additional traffic created by the addition <br />of over 30 homes at the top of Capital Hill? (Simply is there more to the discussions than just current safety issues that <br />have been identified in the 3-27-17 letter?) <br />Q2. What roads have been included in these discussions surrounding safety issues for emergency access to Capital Hill? <br />(The 3-27-17 letter discussed multiple routes, and roads, and safety issues with each of them. The entire route and <br />alternates from the fire station to the top of Capital Hill could present many safety issues.) <br />Q3. Are the discussions including possible changes to the current (or future) road access to address the safety issues <br />raised in the 3-27-17 letter? and if so, what changes? <br />Q4. What criteria are being used to determine if the emergency access routes to the top of capital hill are safe now and in <br />the future with any possible changes to improve or through increased traffic of 30+ houses? <br />Q5. Who in Public Works is working on this or involved in the discussions? <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.