My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE - Batch C
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE - Batch C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2018 4:02:57 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:19:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Misc.
Document_Date
3/6/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C!OELLO Nick., <br />MEN= <br />From: <br />Sent: <br />1,0: <br />Cc: <br />Subject: <br />Susan Hoffman <shortgamesue@yahoo.com> <br />Wednesday, November 15, 2017 9:29 AM <br />GIOELLO Nick R <br />Tom Bruno; Becky Dorsey; Cathy Johnson; Susan Hoffman; Nathaniel Teich <br />CHPUD Re-Routing of Cupola Drive due to Landslide Potential <br />Hi Nick. The Geotech Report prepared by Branch Engineering dated 216/17 (and the three page <br />letter update dated May 30, 2017) discuss landslide potential in the southeast area of the proposed <br />project. The site plan labeled Figure 1 in the report shows an original routing for the private drive <br />(Cupola Drive) as traversing the steep lots x#15 through ##20 (old site plan) and terminating at Capital <br />at the most southerly end of the PUD. Figure 2 in the report shows a revised site plan eliminating this <br />routing for Cupola and leaving a singular loop road connecting to Capital. This revised Cupola route is <br />to the north of the existing house and 3 unit apartment. The Figure 2 site plan also shows an <br />rectangular open space between Lots 18 & 19 where none existed on Figure 1. (Note that Figure 2 is <br />also somewhat dated and has incorrect lot numbers compared to the current site plan in the 8/22/17 <br />application.) The 5/30/17 three page supplement to the Geotech Report indicates at the bottom of <br />page one "one location in the southeast portion of the site was mapped as the upper section of a <br />landslide area; subsequent site design omitted development in this area." <br />Was the site plan change "city driven"? Does your department and/or the city have any <br />documentation that you could provide to our committee regarding this change to the site plan?? <br />Another member of our committee may have some more specific questions for you in this regard over <br />the coming days. Thanks as always for your assistance. <br />Sorry that this question is a little past the 9 AM guideline. Took me awhile to "pen it." <br />Susan Hoffman <br />541-654-5458 (home) <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.