ELL Nick <br />From: <br />GIOELLO Nick R <br />Sent: <br />Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:23 PM <br />To: <br />'Brent Lorscheider' <br />Subject: <br />FW: Questions <br />Brent, in my response below i left out a critical word. It should have read: <br />We do not "read' them into the record... <br />My apology for any confusion I may have caused. <br />Thanks, <br />Nick <br />From: GIOELLO Nick R <br />Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 3:57 PM <br />To: 'Brent Lorscheider' <lorsch2728@pacbe11.net> <br />Subject: RE: Questions <br />Brent, <br />I'll only be putting in items you (or anyone else) request specifically be included in the record. I will also put into the <br />record correspondence that expressed an opinion about the development proposal. We do "read' them into the record, <br />we add them to the online archive and the Hearings Official is given access to that archive and will read the contents. <br />Thanks, <br />Nick <br />From: Brent Lorscheider [mailto:lorsch2728@pacbell.net] <br />Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 1:08 PIM <br />To: GIOELLO Nick R <Nick.R.Gioello@Ci.euRene.or.us> <br />Subject: Questions <br />Will all of the questions, and your respective answers, (via email) be read into the record for the Cap Hill PUD? <br />brent <br />1 <br />