evening if that is ®K. Also I have a couple of real simple questions of my oven which I'll send along in <br />a minute. Thanks as always. <br />Forwarded Message <br />From: Brent Lorscheider <1orsch2728pacbe11.net> <br />To: Susan Hoffman <short amesue@yahoo.com> <br />Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017, 10:17:05 AM PST <br />Subject: Question for Nick of Stormwater <br />Please forward the following question to Nick: <br />The Application Stormwater Plan and Drainage Study (SW Plan) states "The primary goal for stromwater management on Capital <br />Drive is to match existing drainage patterns and peak discharge rates through the design storm. (pg3). The SW Plan makes several <br />more references about matching pre-developed levels. <br />1. What code sections support this goal of matching post development drainage patterns and flow levels with pre development <br />drainage patterns and flow levels? <br />2. Does the goal of capturing and treating approximately 80% of the average annual rainfall (EC 9.6790) supercede the goal <br />statement of matching pre and post development flows? <br />3. Does EC 9.6790 apply to existing impervious and pervious surfaces that become incorporated into a new development, land <br />application or PUD? If EC 9.6790 does not apply then what code section would apply? <br />