My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE - Batch B
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE - Batch B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2018 4:02:01 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:18:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Misc.
Document_Date
3/6/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: GIOELLO Nick R <br />Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 3:36 PM <br />To: 'Brent Lorscheider' <br />Subject: RE: Question on stormwater plan for a Chpud <br />Brent, <br />The following is the applicant's response: <br />I am here to help in any way I can. <br />We do not specifically address the stormwater from each of the lots whether they are bound or not. <br />There is no way to speculate the actual stormwater run-off from each lot because no impervious surfaces are <br />proposed on the lots yet. <br />What if the lot isn't developed at all. <br />Why make up specific solutions for future development? <br />Typically, in a subdivision or land division situation the evaluation of the stormwater for individual lots is done at <br />time of building permit. <br />When the actual impervious surface is proposed and known. <br />Public works will review each building permit as it come in and review it for compliance with the PUD. <br />Basically the PUD is tasked with limiting stormwater to pre-development flows whether it is from the proposed <br />streets, drives, sidewalks, driveways, homes, etc. (in other words, impervious surfaces). <br />The proposed streets and sidewalks are a known quantity so we address those with specific solutions. <br />The vacant lots are not so PW reviews those at time of building permit submittal. <br />The standards are no different at time of submittal for building permit. <br />And if the design of the lot can't meet the stormwater requirements then they don't get a building permit until <br />they come up with a solution that works. <br />And there isn't any situation where the owner of the lot can't meet the criteria. <br />Sometimes it costs more than they want but we have never met a project/building/road etc. where there wasn't <br />a solution. <br />Money solves everything. <br />For example, underground storage tanks that slowly release the water. No one wants to pay for those but they <br />might have to. <br />Or flow through planters. Constructed, typically concrete planters built around the house. Those aren't cheap <br />solutions but they are a solution. Etc. Etc. <br />Does that help? <br />Thanks <br />carol <br />Carol Schirmer <br />Schirmer Satre Group <br />Planners, Landscape Architects, Environmental Specialists <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.