You can also say here is less water is flowing along the road than before this designed solution <br />See section 3.1.3, paragraph 2 for the civil engineers specific language. <br />3 Does said analysis of runoff from lots 21 - 32 apply EC 9.6793 (3) (b) as a minimum standard, since the application has not <br />demonstrated otherwise? <br />[ces] We are in a headwaters area by definition but we do not draining directly into a headwaters stream. <br />We are however, meeting flow control requirements therefore we meet this standard. <br />4. Does EC9.6794 apply since the CHPUD will result in over 100 or more offstreet parking spaces in the form of driveways and <br />designated parking? <br />[ces] No it doesn't apply. We potentially have 31 additional units as a result of the development. At 1 car per unit required <br />parking we are parking less than 100 cars. Parked cars are determined by unit count per the parking requirements in the <br />land use code. They are not determined by how large a driveway is and how many cars can fit on those driveways. <br />thx, brent <br />From: GIOELLO Nick R <Mick. R.Gioello(c)ci.eugene.or.us> <br />To: Brent Lorscheider <Iorsch2728 a pacbell.net> <br />Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 4:36 PM <br />Subject: RE: Question on stormwater plan for a Chpud <br />Brent I got this from the applicant: <br />Those are the lots at the top of the hill between the two roadways. Lots 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, <br />27, 28, 29, 30, 31, & 32. Those lots, upon meeting flow control and water quality requirements, <br />will not be able to release into their own level spreader because they are cut off from those <br />open spaces and park areas by the roadway improvements. Therefore they will have to <br />release into the public and private roadways (via weep hole or some other method). The <br />existing runoff from those lots was accounted for in the storm analysis. <br />Hope that answers your question, <br />Mick <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Brent Lorscheider [mailto:lorsch2728CcDpacbell.net] <br />Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 12:21 AM <br />To: GIOELLO Nick R <Nick.R.Gioello(@ci.eugene.or.up <br />Cc: Cathy Johnson <cdjohnson617(.msn.com> <br />Subject: Question on stormwater plan for a Chpud <br />Page 5 of the Stormwater plan and drainage study refers to "the lots bound by the new roadway <br />improvements" in the second paragraph. Could you please ask the applicant to identify the lot <br />numbers being referenced in this paragraph to avoid any ambiguity thank you Brent <br />Sent from my iPhone <br />