GIOELLO Nick <br />From: <br />GILLESPIE Scott N <br />Sent: <br />Monday, April 17, 2017 8:56 AM <br />To: <br />Brent Lorscheider <br />Cc: <br />GIOELLO Nick R; FAVREAU Eric J <br />Subject: <br />RE: Cap Hill PUD - Utilities <br />Hi Brent, <br />Sorry for the late reply. All development proposals are reviewed for sewer service against sewer basin master <br />plans and engineering design standards. Each individual development is not required to submit an <br />engineering study to confirm capacity. Consistency with basin master planning and providing minimum <br />collection main sizing serves as confirmation of capacity under City sewer service policies. The proposed <br />points of connection and main extensions are consistent with engineering standards and have been confirmed <br />with our sewer planning engineers. <br />Thanks, <br />Scott Gillespie, PE <br />Public Works Engineering <br />99 East Broadway, Suite 400 <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />541-682-2706 <br />From: Brent Lorscheider [mailto:lorsch2728@pacbell.net] <br />Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 2:31 PM <br />To: GILLESPIE Scott N <Scott.N.Gillespie@ci.eugene.or.us> <br />Subject: Fw: Cap Hill PUD - Utilities <br />Hi Scott, <br />Regarding my request for information pertaining to the Capital Hill PUD: <br />1. I assume your department must conduct some type of sewer capacity analysis to determine if an existing sewer has sufficient <br />capacity for a proposed development tie-in. I believe the Cap Hill Pud proposes to connect up to 44 dwelling units to an existing 8 <br />inch public sewer, does/will that sewer have capacity for the additional flow from the development? <br />On Monday, April 10, 2017 2:08 PM, GIOELLO Nick R <Nick.R.Gioello a( ,ci.eugene.or.us> wrote: <br />Hi Brent, <br />I received the following from Scott Gillespie, Civil Engineer II and Development Review Manager, after I asked <br />him for clarification why part of your request triggered a formal Public Information Request: <br />Hi Nick, <br />The justification is on the PIR request form. His request is extensive (likely a Level 1) requiring many <br />previous years, multiple divisions, multiple staff, multiple databases, multiple archives and multiple <br />pages. A request of this nature would also typically trigger a review from the City Attorney's Office due <br />to its size and breadth. This information is not typically reviewed by PW staff during a land use <br />application as there are not criteria that directly speak to asset management and maintenance <br />operations. <br />