My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE - Batch A
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE - Batch A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2018 4:01:00 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:15:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Misc.
Document_Date
3/6/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I L Nick <br />From: <br />GIOELLO Nick R <br />Sent: <br />Wednesday, June 21, 2017 11:34 AM <br />To: <br />'Brent Lorscheider' <br />Subject: <br />RE: South Hills Study <br />Hi Brent, <br />The Capital Hill PUD resubmittal is in and posted online. I'm assuming you can navigate our website easily by now. If not <br />here's a link to the search pager <br />http://pdd.eugene-or.gov/LandUse/ApplicationSearch <br />Thanks, <br />Dick <br />Nil' <br />s <br />ir:-,er ; r <br />From: Brent Lorscheider [mailto:lorsch2728@pacbell.net] <br />Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 2:12 PM <br />To: GIOELLO Nick R <Nick.R.Gioello@ci.eugene.or.us> <br />Subject: Re: South Hills Study <br />Thanks Nick you're available to talk this afternoon by phone <br />Sent from my iPhone <br />On Apr 26, 2017, at 9:31 AM, GIOELLO Nick R <Nick.R.Gioello (z-ci.eLi.C3ene.or.us> wrote: <br />Brent, take a look at this portion of a previous staff report as an example of what parts of the South Hills <br />Study {SHS} are considered in the review. <br />As per the SHS resolution that adopted the policies as land use regulations, it also clarifies the SHS only <br />applies to property over 500 feet in elevation and south of 18th Avenue, which this site obviously is. <br />When providing opposing testimony, you can make an argument if you think there are other applicable <br />policies in the SHS that should apply. <br />Thanks, <br />dick <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.