because the particular application at issue cannot satisfy the particular clear and objective <br />standards. Here, it is not the case that the clear and.objective standards are violated in all <br />instances. Similar to the case in Southeast Neighbors Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of Eugene, the <br />applicant's frustration with the needed housing track as applied to this application, "does not <br />convert an otherwise clear and objective standard into a standard that offends ORS 197.307(4)." <br />Or LUBA _ (LUBA No 2013-004 July 12, 2013). <br />As explained above, applying subjective criteria contained in the General Track will not <br />violate the Needed Housing statute because the applicant retains the option of applying only <br />clear and objective criteria under the Needed Housing track. The applicant's arguments to the <br />contrary in the March 3, 2017, letter should, therefore, be disregarded. <br />Sincerely, <br />r <br />Sean T. Malone <br />Cc: <br />Clients <br />