My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LUBA Final Order: PDT 13-1 Related Motions
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
LUBA Final Order: PDT 13-1 Related Motions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2018 4:03:05 PM
Creation date
1/29/2018 10:20:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Supplemental Materials
Document_Date
1/29/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i n <br />: <br />r <br />1 <br />, accompanied by a certificate "of service On "":December: 21, 2017, :OMC <br />responded with "an ; affidavit averring that the certificate of compliance was. <br />3" <br />: placed, in the .mail to Stedman. on November'"30 201.7,;. as. OMC's cover, letter. <br />4 <br />indicated: OMC's response also includes.: another copy af.the certificate of <br />, <br />5 <br />compliance, and includes a certificate of service.'. <br />6 <br />: Under OAR 661-010 0075(2)(b)(B) a document is "served on other: <br />7 <br />. "-parties by person or."by" first` class mail, and: mail service: is, complete ondeposit <br />8. <br />in. the-mail. Proof of mailing is:not required; and receipt is not necessary to, - <br />" 9 <br />= complete. service.' Under our rules, service. of'the certificate' of compliance on <br />f <br />10 <br />.1 'Stedman was accomplished. on December. 2l, 2017,.if not before that date, and <br />11 <br />therefore no more corrective action is. required: <br />12 <br />Stedman argues, nonetheless, that OMC's alleged" violations _of LUBA's <br />r <br />13 <br />: ':rules in failing to timely, (1) serve the certificate of compliance on Stedman and <br />14 <br />2 file a certificate of service. with LUBA are more than. "technical <br />. .violations <br />' <br />, <br />15 <br />of-LUBA's. rules.. OAR. 661-010-0005 (technical violations, not-°affecting the <br />16 <br />` "substantial. rights of parties shall not interfere with the review.of"a land use <br />_ 17 <br />decision or"limit"ed-: land' se decision).. Stedman continues <br />to <br />insist <br />, that the <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />18 <br />only.remedy for those untimely flings is to strike OMC's response'brie€and"`its <br />19 <br />"bra"l argument: However; Stedman makes no "attempt to establish that any delay. <br />20 <br />in' service or .filing of any pleading prejudiced her. substantial.rights in. thin <br />.21 <br />appeal„ and we see no prejudice.."' Accordingly, Stedman's motion and, amended <br />22 <br />. motion are- denied. <br />= - w <br />Page 13 <br />. <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.