My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPLICATION COMPLETENESS REVIEW (3-31-17)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
APPLICATION COMPLETENESS REVIEW (3-31-17)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2017 4:00:51 PM
Creation date
9/18/2017 10:32:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL
Document Type
Application Completeness Review
Document_Date
3/31/2017
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hazardous Materials Review <br />Yes No <br />El ® 25. Is a Hazardous Materials Review application required? <br />Comments: <br />Street a <br />nd Public Access Way Requirements <br />Submitted <br />Missing <br />Incomplete <br />N/A <br />26. Identify the number of peak hour trips based on the likely development <br />that will occur on all lots resulting from the land division. If the <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />development will generate 100 or more trips during any peak hour, a <br />Traffic Impact Analysis Review is required in accordance with 9.8650 - <br />9.8680. <br />El <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />27. Show street names for all existing and proposed streets (public and <br />private) and identify the street classification. <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />28. Indicate potential slope easements. <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />29. Delineate any street segments where grade exceeds 15% percent, where <br />drivewa s are prohibited. <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />30. Provide a street center profile using ground elevations of proposed streets <br />at or exceeding 15% grade. <br />31. Show location and widths (right-of-way and paving width) of all existing <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />and proposed streets, intersections, and bike and pedestrian access ways, <br />both within the plat and adjacent to the lat. <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />32. Show existing and proposed curbs and sidewalks on site and adjacent to <br />property involved. <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />33. Address EC 9.6815 Street Connectivity and provide supporting narrative <br />or if requesting an exception, provide justifications. <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />34. Show that the proposal is consistent with Eugene Code Section 9.6780, <br />Vision Clearance Area. <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />35. Indicate radii of all street curves on the plans. <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />36. Show location and type of existing and proposed transit-related facilities. <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />37. Show existing and proposed special setbacks, in accordance with Eugene <br />Code Section 9.6750. <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />38. Submit an Alternative Traffic Safety Study (ATSS) if an adjustment is <br />request d to the required internal vehicle stacking at EC 9.6703(3)(a). <br />39. Show all existing access driveways to the property. When the property <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />fronts a street under Lane County jurisdiction, show driveway locations <br />for adjacent properties also. <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />40. Demonstrate that access to the development site is located in accordance <br />with EC 7.420. <br />41. Submit an ATSS if requesting more than one access connection for a <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />single development site and/or requesting that an access connection be <br />wider than 20 feet. <br />,,.,t;, <br />nto al <br />42 <br />include <br />edestfi <br />'+i EC <br />l <br />d <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />. <br />i <br />p <br />an <br />p <br />an aeeef <br />anee <br />9-.67-3334. <br />Comments: <br />27 - Show street name for proposed private street. 28 - Potential grading shown, but please identify as slope <br />easement. 31 - Show right of way width of existing portion of Capital Drive to remain. 42 - Per planning review. <br />Planned Unit Development Completeness Review Form Revised 6/2015 Paee 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.