because the particular application at issue cannot satisfy the particular clear and objective <br />standards. Here, it is not the case that the clear and objective standards are violated in all <br />instances. Similar to the case in Southeast Neighbors Neighborhood AssÓn v. City of Eugene, the <br />applicantÓs frustration with the needed housing track as applied to this application, Ðdoes not <br />conv ert an otherwise clear and objective standard into a standard that offends ORS 197.307(4).Ñ <br />___ Or LUBA ___ (LUBA No 2013-004 July 12, 2013). <br />As explained above, applying subjective criteria contained in the General Track will not <br />violate the Needed Housing statute because the applicant retains the option of applying only <br />clear and objective criteria under the Needed Housing track. The applicantÓs arguments to the <br />contrary in the March 3, 2017, letter should, therefore, be disregarded. <br /> Sincerely, <br />Sean T. Malone <br />Cc: <br />Clients <br />3 <br /> <br />