Capital Hill PUD: PDT 17-01 <br />Completeness Review Response <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />Conversations with staff following the issuance of this Completeness Review revealed that these <br />discussion with Parks and Open space staff is unnecessary. The requirement for a Planned Unit <br />Development is as follows: <br />EC 9.6815 Connectivity for Streets <br />(2) Street Connectivity Standards. <br />(b) The proposed development shall include street connections in the direction of all existing <br />or planned streets within mile of the development site. The proposed development <br />shall also include street connections to any streets that abut, are adjacent to, or terminate <br />at the development site. <br />Capital Hill PUD fronts Capital Drive. Capital Drive right of way is dedicated, and will be <br />improved to the point where it abuts the north property line (the south border of Hendricks <br />Park). This criterion is met with this existing dedicated right of way and proposed street <br />improvement. There is no requirement to ensure that there are future extensions of <br />existing right-of-ways through abutting properties. <br />• On page 45 (and page 54) of the narrative you indicate that lots 7, 15-20 and 23 are larger than <br />the maximum of 13, 500 square feet. It would be helpful to provide the amount of square footage <br />to be preserved for natural resource protection, and the remaining usable square feet of those <br />lots. For example, lot 16 is 20, 712 square feet but the preserved rea totals 8,075 square feet, <br />thereby reducing the usable area of the lot to 12,637 square feet. <br />The lot numbers have changed as the Site Plan has been changed slightly so as to reduce the <br />number of lots requiring a renumbering of the lots. <br />These 2 sections have been changed to reflect the amount of property contained in the <br />preservation area vs. the usable are of the lot. <br />4. Clearly states whether site is included in City's Acknowledged Goal 5 inventory <br />• Page 31 of the narrative states that the project is not in the Goal 5 inventory, however, staff <br />(notes?) the site is listed as Goal 5. Please amend the narrative accordingly and address the <br />Goal 5 criteria in EC 9.8320(4)(a)(2). <br />The project is on the Goal 5 inventory. The Written Statement has been revised accordingly. <br />Site Plan Requirements <br />15. Location of all existing and proposed structures shown. Indicated whether the existing structures will <br />remain or be removed. <br />Although it is not possible at this time to know the exact individual homes that may be built on the <br />lots, the limits of building impact on each lot should be shown with building envelopes. <br />See Site Plan. <br />The areas in green are preservation areas. The remaining area is the potential area for impact of <br />a development on each individual lot Guessing where an individual may want to develop on a <br />piece of property has never proven fruitful. We have done our best to limit the impact to the site <br />by putting some of the property in preservation areas to be managed by the HOA and some of <br />the individual tax lots in preservation areas to be managed by the individual property owner. <br />Both areas are off limits to disturbance and conditions have been proposed on the Tree <br />Preservation Plan. <br />The lots are generous in both width and size to allow flexibility for development. Additionally, if <br />smaller lots were proposed, given the existing topography, experience has shown us that the lots <br />end up being cleared of all trees in order to accommodate the grading necessary for the building <br />and the driveway. <br />Schirmer Satre Group • 375 West 4 m Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 • (541) 686-4540 <br />