This subarea is divided into many small lots in a diversity of ownership. The sites are fragmented by <br />the constraints identified in the previous section. Additionally, two small areas of second priority <br />land in Subarea P2.7 were identified in prior analysis, above, as being of insufficient size to meet a <br />portion of the industrial land need, but which would be considered here in association with adjacent <br />sites of fourth priority land. Eight sites in this subarea are of sufficient size to accommodate a <br />needed industrial site. These sites are labeled as P4.6a through P4.6h on the map "Subarea P4.6: <br />Site Characteristics of Unconstrained Land." <br />Subarea P4.6 Summary. Based on these findings, the City has determined that Subarea P4.6 has eight <br />sites (P4.6a-h) suitable for further consideration for industrial expansion. <br />(c) Dismiss Candidate Land to which Future Urban Services Could not <br />Reasonably be Provided Due to Topographical or other Physical <br />Constraints <br />All land in Subarea P4.6 can be served. <br />(d) Dismiss Candidate Land if its Inclusion in the UGB would be <br />Untenable Considering the Comparative Environmental, Energy, <br />Economic and Social Consequences that would Result from its <br />Inclusion in the UGB <br />Site P4.6a - <br />This site is 16.9 contiguous acres of a 19.9 acre tax lot designated for Agriculture. It is immediately <br />adjacent to the UGB on its eastern edge, where land inside the UGB is designated Industrial. Land to the <br />west and south is designated for a mixture of Agriculture and Forest use, while land to the north is <br />designated Rural Residential. The tax lot immediately to the south is developed by the Greenhill <br />Humane Society. <br />Environmental: Expansion onto this site for industrial purposes would create an industrial site adjacent <br />to forest and agricultural land to the west. This adjacency could have potential minor environmental <br />consequences. Overall environmental consequences from expanding onto this site for industrial use <br />would be slightly negative to neutral. <br />Energy: The mix of surrounding uses and the adjacency of this site to the current UGB suggests potential <br />positive energy impacts due to efficient location of employment relative to other uses. Overall energy <br />consequences from expanding onto this site for industrial use would be positive. <br />Economic: A UGB expansion to include Site P4.6a would have positive economic consequences, as it is <br />contiguous with both the UGB and the city limits, making it immediately developable. Negative <br />economic consequences include the cost to extend urban services to this site, which is isolated from all <br />but one other small potential industrial expansion site (P4.6b). Overall economic consequences from <br />expanding onto this site for industrial use would be positive. <br />Appendix B to Findings May 2017 Page 86 <br />