Dismissal of Land with Slopes in <br />Excess of 5 Percent Grade <br />The United States Geological <br />Survey's 10-meter digital elevation <br />model shows that 6.6 acres of the <br />land in Subarea P2.8 (6 percent) <br />are constrained by slopes greater <br />than 5%. <br />Dismissal of Land within FEMA <br />Flood Zones (Special Flood Hazard <br />Area) <br />29.8 acres of the land in Subarea <br />P2.8 (29 percent) is constrained by <br />the FEMA mapped Special Flood <br />Hazard Area. <br />Dismissal of Land with Goal 5 <br />Protections (natural resources) <br />0.1 acres of the land in Subarea <br />P2.8 (less than 1 percent) is <br />constrained by Lane County Goal 5 <br />protections. <br />Dismissal of Land with Existing <br />Uses/ Development that makes <br />Industrial Redevelopment Highly <br />Unlikely in Planning Period <br />Three (3) tax lots totaling 15.6 <br />acres in Subarea P2.8 (15 percent) have existing uses or development that makes it highly <br />unlikely that, if added to the UGB, the sites would be redeveloped for industrial uses. Two tax <br />lots are used for wetland mitigation by the City of Eugene. The third tax lot is developed by <br />Brownings Dog Ranch Tails Inn.26 This business already contributes to the employment of the <br />region, and so adding this lot with the intent of converting it to a large-lot industrial properties <br />would fail to meet the City's economic development needs, resulting in either the same number <br />of jobs or a net loss, depending on employment density. <br />Summary of Development Constraints <br />In all, 51.9 acres of the land in Subarea P2.8 have one or more development constraints <br />("factors that temporarily or permanently limit or prevent the use of land for economic <br />development" per OAR 660-009-005(2)). The remaining 52.1 acres of land in Subarea P2.8 are <br />addressed below. <br />26 Were these tax lots not discarded for uses/development that make industrial redevelopment highly unlikely, <br />they would be discarded for lack of access within one mile to a Freight Route. <br />Appendix B to Findings May 2017 Page 42 <br />