Eugene Ordinance Exhibit J <br />[Lane County Ordinance Exhibit G] <br />Resources Conservation overlay zone) was appropriate, thereby allowing the conflicting uses in a limited <br />way that protects the significant riparian corridors. This is documented through an amendment to <br />section IV of the Water Resources Conservation Plan and the application of the /WR Overlay Zone to the <br />appropriate land, both actions taken as part of this ordinance. <br />For the Clear Lake UGB expansion area, this requirement is addressed in detail on pages 66 - 67 of the <br />December 8, 2016 ESEE analysis prepared by Winterbrook, which is included at Appendix F to these <br />findings. The City is proposing to fully allow conflicting uses within the riparian corridors, consistent with <br />(c) above. This is documented through an amendment to section IV of the Water Resources <br />Conservation Plan. As described in the ESEE, this "No Local Protection Program" means the wetland <br />areas can be developed, consistent with other regulations that will apply (e.g. zoning, wetland banking, <br />inter-agency coordination, stormwater management planning, the application of the Goal 6 /WQ Water <br />Quality overlay zone to two major stormwater conveyance channels and a city-approved area-wide <br />stormwater master plan that incorporates green infrastructure). Furthermore, any wetlands within the <br />riparian corridors will continue to be regulated by the Oregon Department of State Lands and the US <br />Army Corps of Engineers. <br />3. Adopt Protection Measures for those Significant Resource Sites Identified for Protection under <br />2. above. (660-023-0050) <br />660-023-0050(1) For each resource site, local governments shall adopt comprehensive <br />plan provisions and land use regulations to implement the decisions made pursuant to <br />OAR 660-023-0040(5). The plan shall describe the degree of protection intended for each <br />significant resource site. The plan and implementing ordinances shall clearly identify those <br />conflicting uses that are allowed and the specific standards or limitations that apply to the <br />allowed uses. A program to achieve Goal 5 may include zoning measures that partially or <br />fully allow conflicting uses (see OAR 660-023-0040(5)(b) and (c)). <br />For significant sites identified for protection in the Santa Clara UGB expansion area, as described in a <br />memo from Alissa Hansen dated November 28, 2016, the City is applying an already-acknowledged <br />acknowledged Goal 5 protection measure - the /WR Water Resources Conservation overlay zone - as <br />part of this ordinance. <br />Wildlife Habitat Areas (Safe Harbor Process <br />For wildlife habitat resources, the safe harbor Goal 5 process was used. When new wildlife habitat areas <br />are identified, the safe harbor process includes specific steps to determine whether to protect the site <br />and, if so, how to do so. As explained below, no new habitat sites were identified in either expansion <br />area. <br />As discussed above, the City chose to be proactive in identifying Goal 5 resources present in the UGB <br />expansion area. The City hired PHS to conduct an inventory of wildlife habitat sites in both the Clear <br />17 <br />May 2017 <br />