Eugene Ordinance Exhibit J <br />[Lane County Ordinance Exhibit G] <br />As discussed above, the City chose to be proactive in identifying Goal 5 resources present in the UGB <br />expansion areas. The City hired PHS to address the first part of the Goal 5 process (Inventory Process) in <br />both the Clear Lake and Santa Clara areas. PHS provided the City with this information in two <br />documents. For the Clear Lake area, PHS's riparian area information is included in a report dated May <br />2014 entitled "City of Eugene Local Wetland Inventory - Clear Lake Area UGB Expansion." For the Santa <br />Clara area, PHS's riparian area information is included in a memo to the City dated October 21, 2014.5 In <br />addition, the City consulted the acknowledged Goal 5 work pertaining to riparian corridors, to identify <br />any riparian corridors protected within the City's current UGB that extend into one of the expansion <br />areas. <br />The City hired a second consultant, Winterbrook, to conduct the second part of the Goal 5 process (ESEE <br />Decision Process). Winterbrook's work is set out in a report dated December 8, 2016 titled "Goal 5 ESEE <br />Analysis for Significant Wetlands and Riparian Corridors" which is included at Appendix F to these <br />findings. <br />1. Conduct an Inventory Process to compile a list of significant resources in the UGB expansion <br />areas by taking the following 4 steps (OAR 660-023-0030): <br />(A) Collect Information about Goal 5 Resource Sites <br />660-23-0030(2) - The inventory process begins with the collection of existing and available <br />information, including inventories, surveys, and other applicable data about potential <br />Goal 5 resource sites. If a PAPA or periodic review work task pertains to certain specified <br />sites, the local government is not required to collect information regarding other resource <br />sites in the jurisdiction. When collecting information about potential Goal 5 sites, local <br />governments shall, at a minimum: <br />(a) Notify state and federal resource management agencies and request current <br />resource information; and <br />(b) Consider other information submitted in the local process. <br />For riparian corridors, 660-023-0090(4) sets out a more specific requirement with regard to the <br />consultation of federal and state agencies. That rule is addressed below. To the extent any information <br />about potential riparian areas was submitted during the local process, that information is referenced <br />and addressed in these findings. <br />660-023-0090(4) - When following the standard inventory process in OAR 660-023-0030, <br />local governments shall collect information regarding all water areas, fish habitat, riparian <br />areas, and wetlands within riparian corridors. Local governments may postpone <br />determination of the precise location of the riparian area on lands designated for farm or <br />forest use until receipt of applications for local permits for uses that would conflict with <br />these resources. Local governments are encouraged, but not required, to conduct field <br />investigations to verify the location, quality, and quantity of resources within the riparian <br />corridor. At a minimum, local governments shall consult the following sources, where <br />available, in order to inventory riparian corridors along rivers, lakes, and streams within <br />the jurisdiction: <br />5 The subject line on PHS' October 21, 2014 memo mistakenly states: "City of Eugene Local Wetland Inventory - Clear Lake Area <br />UGB Expansion." <br />11 <br />May 2017 <br />