My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017 Remand - Planning Commission Staff Report
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
2017 Remand - Planning Commission Staff Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2017 4:02:19 PM
Creation date
5/15/2017 12:43:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Appeal Materials
Document_Date
5/15/2017
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Letter stating that the owner 160 Oakleigh Lane does not grant permission for use of <br />4-12-17 <br />Lauren Regan <br />their property that is abutting the south boundary of the Oakleigh Lane right-of-way. <br />4-12-17 <br />Maureen <br />Letter of support stating the safety of Oakleigh Lane will be increased. <br />McCauley <br />Letter regarding emergency response, the transportation system, and local street <br />4-12-17 <br />Paul Conte <br />standards. Multiple attachments including a traffic assessment of a segment of Oakleigh <br />Lane from Haregu Nemariam, P.E. <br />4-12-17 <br />Sandy Thorns <br />Letter from "Oakleigh McClure Neighbors" stating agreement with conclusions from the <br />Nemariam traffic assessment. <br />Comments regarding traffic safety hazards, neighborhood character and environmental <br />4-12-17 <br />Scott Stedman <br />issues. <br />Memo regarding street standards, comments from City Attorney, Fire Department and <br />4-12-17 <br />Planning Staff <br />Public Works. <br />Second Open Record Period (Response) <br />Closed on April 26, 2017; anyone could submit written testimony (evidence or argument) that directly <br />responds to testimony received during the first open-record period. Copies of all testimony submitted <br />during the second open record period have been provided to the Planning Commission. Testimony <br />submitted during the second open record period is summarized below: <br />Table 2: Summary of Second Open Record Period Testimony <br />Submitted <br />From <br />Summary of Testimony <br />4-13-17 <br />Paul Conte <br />Challenge to impartiality of Planning Commissioner Kristen Taylor. <br />4-13-17 <br />William Heinze <br />Comments regarding width of Oakleigh Lane and drainage problems on the street. <br />4-17-17 <br />Bill Randall <br />Declaring conflict of interest and recusing from the Planning Commission deliberations. <br />4-17-17 <br />Paul Conte <br />Records request related to "Challenge of Impartiality." <br />4-17-17 <br />Planning Staff <br />Email correspondence between Planning, Fire and Public Works staff. <br />4-19-17 <br />Bryn Thoms <br />Comments regarding paving width of Oakleigh Lane, and stating disagreement with <br />Public Works' comment that the configuration of Oakleigh Lane is "common" in Eugene. <br />4-19-17 <br />Paul Conte <br />"Motion to Strike" city staff testimony submitted on April 12, 2017. <br />4-19-17 <br />Sandy Thorns <br />Comments regarding paving width, jurisdiction of Oakleigh Lane, and queuing streets. <br />Attachments include "Eimstad Survey", tax lot map from City website, and Lane County <br />document regarding Local Access Roads (LARs). <br />4-24-17 <br />Paul Conte <br />"Public Records Request Form" related to the "Challenge of Impartiality." <br />4-25-17 <br />Planning Staff <br />Response to the Nemariam "traffic assessment" and other testimony regarding <br />jurisdiction and street standards. <br />Page 3 <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.