Eugene Planning Commission <br />May 3, 2017 <br />Page 10 of 10 <br />are not warranted by the City code. However, as is set forth above, there is no traffic <br />safety issue on Oakleigh Lane, and certainly no legal basis to require member-owners <br />to improve the existing street to current standards. <br />As has been confirmed by a professional Traffic Engineer, the City Public <br />Works, and the Fire Marshal's office Oakleigh Lane will continue to function safely <br />with the proposed development, and the PUD will actually improve street safety by <br />providing a fire department turnaround that the street presently lacks. With regard to <br />future improvement of the street to current standards, OMC is already contributing its <br />proportionate share of right-of-way and is committing via an Irrevocable Petition to <br />contribute to future improvements once the street is brought up to urban standards. <br />Nothing more is required, and we respectfully request that Planning Commission <br />again affirm its prior determination of approval. <br />Very truly yours, <br />HUTCHINSON COX <br />illiam H. Sherlock <br />Zack P. Mittge <br />ZPM / jm <br />cc: client <br />