Attachment C <br />Dan, <br />Here is my understanding' could you please confirm or correct by Monday or Tuesday. <br />Jurisdiction <br />Based on the attached map from the City, the eastern section that's within the shaded area ("Ward <br />7") is in the City. The rest is in the County. Once I found this map, it seemed pretty clear.–There <br />was no map attached, but I would agree with this statement. <br />Classification <br />The County classifies Oakleigh Lane as a Local Access Road (LAR)– Yes Oakleigh Lane is classified as <br />a Local Access Road. <br />Applicable Standards <br />LC 15.706(2)(c) provides for applying Eugene street standards, but that's not under consideration <br />here.- I would however, point out that pursuant to Lane Code 15.706(2)(a), regarding <br />applicability, LC 15.706 standards apply to roads when located within Lane County’s land use <br />jurisdiction. By intergovernmental agreement, land use jurisdiction resides with the City of Eugene <br />inside of the city’s urban growth boundary. Since this development is located within the city’s <br />land use jurisdiction, Lane Code 15.706 does not apply, and thus LC 15.705 does not apply. <br />In this case it is up to the city to apply applicable standards. Even though the Local Access Road is <br />technically in Lane County, it is within the City of Eugene’s UGB and land use jurisdiction. <br />Please verify below for a road with same specs as Oakleigh Lane, if all within County <br />jurisdiction: <br />The proposed new PUD development comprises 29 condos is at the terminus of Oakleigh <br />Lane. There is no dispute that the projected ADT will be 168 (29 x 5.81), which is substantially <br />over the 101 ADT threshold in LC 15.706(2)(d). <br />LŷğǝĻƓƚƷƭƦĻĭźŅźĭğƌƌǤƩĻǝźĻǞĻķƷŷĻt <br />5ķĻǝĻƌƚƦƒĻƓƷ <br />ğƓǤƷźƒĻƩĻĭĻƓƷƌǤͲğƓķLŷğǝĻƓƚƷƭƦĻĭźŅźĭğƌƌǤƩĻǝźĻǞĻķƷŷĻLƓƭƷźƷǒƷĻƚŅƩğƓƭƦƚƩƷğƷźƚƓ9ƓŭźƓĻĻƩƭΛL9ΜͲƩźƦ <br />3 <br /> <br />