My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017 Remand - Public Comment (2)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
2017 Remand - Public Comment (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:29 PM
Creation date
4/20/2017 2:25:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
4/19/2017
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Department staff also provided comments which are included as Attachment C. In summary, <br />Fire staff conclude that the proposed development will actually improve safety for residents <br />along Oakleigh Lane with the new turnaround. <br />Finally, in preparation for deliberations, staff recommends that the Planning Commission <br />review its previous Final Order on the matter dated October 5, 2015. This Final Order has been <br />added to the current remand record so that it is readily available. We will be available to assist <br />commissioners and the public throughout this process, to provide access to materials <br />submitted during each stage of the open record period set forth in the public notice, and <br />otherwise help locate relevant materials from the record for purposes of upcoming <br />deliberations scheduled on May 22, 2017. <br />It should also be emphasized that LUBA made decisions on some of the issues that are likely to <br />arise again during this remand proceeding before the matter was remanded by the Court of <br />Appeals. LUBA's entire Final Order (LUBA No. 2015-077, April 14, 2016) referenced in this <br />memo has been added to the current remand record so that it is readily available. Particularly <br />relevant excerpts from that Order are included as Attachment D. While new evidence and <br />testimony submitted during the current proceeding could change the Planning Commission's <br />final determination as to whether or not the tentative PUD meets the approval criteria, staff <br />advises that the Planning Commission rely on LUBA's previous findings and conclusions where <br />still relevant and valid, in light of the new testimony and evidence that is expected to be <br />submitted by other parties in this remand proceeding. <br />Attachments: <br />Attachment A - City Attorney Memo <br />Attachment B - Public Works Memo <br />Attachment C - Fire Department Comments <br />Attachment D - Excerpts from LUBA Order <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.