My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017 Remand – Initial Open Record Ending 4-12-17
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
2017 Remand – Initial Open Record Ending 4-12-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:29 PM
Creation date
4/13/2017 10:54:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
4/12/2017
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2❑ <br />F. Over the course of two meetings on June 28 and July 13, the CDCT reached <br />consensus on the conceptual design for all five street segments. However, the CDCT did not <br />reach agreement on the overall design concept because of an outstanding issue regarding the <br />minimum street width. Through a consensus-based decision process, the CDCT determined <br />there were compelling reasons to support a minimum street width of 18 feet (two nine-foot travel <br />lanes). Reasons supporting the recommendation included the CDCT's themes and values <br />regarding preserved neighborhood livability, reduction of traffic speeds, efficient use of urban <br />land in a rural setting, increased safety for all modes of use, and focus on a footprint that fits the <br />neighborhood's character. As such- an 1 R-fnnt Qt-r-t .virlth was perceived to be more consistent <br />with the rD' i 's adopted themes and values than a 20-foot street width. tsascd or those <br />:.oilaboratively developed values, it was the consensus recommendation of the CDCT to pursue a <br />legislative change to the minimum street width (18 feet rather than the prescribed minimum of <br />20 feet) prior to making a decision on the overall design concept. <br />G. Resolu>iut, *T-.. _ 16052 winntinu the. T)e..Cion RtnmAorA- <br />_ Guiaelines contains a <br />provision authorizing administrative amendments to the Design Standards and Guidelines. The <br />proposal to approve a minimum street width of 18 feet encompasses a wide range of community <br />interests that are more appropriate for the City Council to resolve, including safety, efficiency, <br />impacts to adjacent and surrounding residents, and costs assessed to affected property owners. <br />Therefore city staff referred this matter to the City Council. <br />H. The City Council held work sessions on the requested amendment to the street <br />width in the Crest Drive Neighborhood on September 19, 2007 and October 8, 2007, a public <br />hearing on October 15, 2007, and based on the above findings and the testimony presented at the <br />public hearing, is now ready to take action. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, <br />BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a <br />Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows: <br />Section 1. The Design Standards and Guidelines for Streets, Sidewalks, Bikeways and <br />Accessways adopted by Resolution No. 4608 of the City Council is amended by adding the <br />following paragraph as subsection (3) to the Vehicle Travel Lane Width Design Standards <br />provision set forth on page 7, and as subsection (5) to paragraph A, the Vehicle Lanes provision <br />of the Local Street Design Standards set forth on page 36: <br />The minimum travel lane width on streets in the area identified as the Crest Drive <br />Area on the Eugene Street Classification Map is 9'. <br />Section 2. The City Recorder is requested to append a copy of this Resolution to <br />Resolution No. 4608, Ordinance No. 20181 and Ordinance No. 20056. To the extent any of the <br />provisions contained therein conflict with the amendment set forth in Section 1 of this <br />Resolution, the amendment contained herein shall prevail. <br />Resolution - 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.