approval criteria are,at EC 9.8030. The WG permit approval criteria are at EC 9.8815. <br />Public Notice - Public notice of the applications was mailed and posted on August 27, 2013, consistent <br />with the requirements of EC 9.7315 Public Hearing Notice. As of the date of this staff report, written <br />public testimony has been received from the following individuals and forwarded to the Hearings <br />Official for consideration: <br />11 <br />In Favor: David Adee <br />Patricia Holtz <br />Martin Henner <br />Mark Goehring and Julie Hunn <br />Charles Chisholm <br />Pat Bryan <br />Antonia Lewis <br />Otto Poticha <br />Dennis-Clark <br />Carleen Reilly <br />Jodi Sommers <br />Shane MacRhodes <br />Marshall Wilde <br />Avis Eileen Adee <br />David Campbell <br />Jerry Carniglia <br />Sheila Stein <br />Nora Davis <br />Steve Goldman <br />Jim O'Connor & Pen Sand <br />Susan Hyne <br />Clare Strawn <br />Don Kahle <br />Patricia Parcells <br />Mike van Mantgem <br />Opposed: Anne Love <br />Phyllis Temple <br />Paul and Cecelia Heintz <br />Dean Nussbaum <br />Judy Scott <br />Rich Dambrov <br />Rachel Stedman <br />Bryn Thoms <br />Maj Hutchinson <br />Planet Glassberg <br />Nena Lovinger . <br />Charlotte Maloney <br />Dale Greenlee <br />David Cutting <br />Sarah Adkison <br />Don McLean and Elizabeth Marshall <br />Jean Darian, Laurie Trautman, and Simon Trautman <br />In response to comments opposed to the development, staff has evaluated the items of concern in the <br />following evaluation''. The adequacy of the transportation system is evaluated in the following staff <br />report at approval criterion EC 9.8320(5). Density is addressed at EC 9.8320(11)(a). Floodplain <br />development is addressed at EC 9.8320(11)(c). Natural resource impacts are addressed at ECG <br />9.8320(4). Impacts to the Willamette River are evaluated in the concurrent Willamette Greenway <br />permit application, under the approval criteria beginning at EC 9.8815, which follows the PUD <br />evaluation, toward the'end of this report.. Emergency response is addressed at EC 9.8320(6). Water <br />service is conditioned at EC 9.8320(11)(b). The adequacy of public facilities and services is evaluated at <br />EC 9.8320(7): Stormwater runoff is addressed at EC 9.8320(11)(j). Visual impacts, building location, <br />solar access, screening, and compatibility are evaluated at EC 9.8320(3), EC 9.8320(11)(k), and EC <br />9.8320(13). In response to testimony about public notice, staff confirms that signs were posted <br />consistent with code requirements. When staff learned that some signs were no longer in place, staff <br />reposted the area (although not required by code) and added an additional large sign at the end 'of <br />McClure Lane (in excess of code requirements). <br />Staff Report: Oakleigh Meadows Cohousing September 2013 Page 4 <br />HO Agenda - Page 11 <br />