J <br />`conservation,:mixed use development, Jincluding sorrier medium and high=densrty° development, <br />and improved.transit'i'n the'Lower River Road.area; <br />The LARCP offers-several principles violafed'by this part of the OMC PUD. <br />*First the OMC'PUD:asks forhousing.densityjust a.unit or:two belowthe maximum allowed <br />density.: This development` is,sited'at the very end of Oakleigh Lane _ as far:;as it is possible to <br />get froinRive'Road;.,and as close as it ispossible to get to the river and to: publicly owned <br />• Greenway. <br />But the-Concept:,Plan states that, "Higher:density development:will; be,clustered toward tR iver] <br />road, and ,gardens, orchards, acrd lower density development will be l'ocated`along the=river edge: <br />of developrrient zones (pp. 7-8) Here, the, OMC PUD inverts the priorities of the: Concept Plan.: <br />There is'nothing in the,phrase 'higher density ' to'precliide its inclusion of Variations:' vith n R-1- <br />d'esignated zones: <br />*Second,the OlVIC PL7D.plans to developmult-familyunits,in 7's.eparate Buildings <br />But the ConceptPlanstates that for'the residential areas •outside'of,the commercial,zones <br />(including Oakleigh"ineadow)-.ire. "R=1• Zoned Areas'along River Road:.. The development goal <br />for these areas is`to,preserve and re t force.theesingle family character:of existing R=1 zoned <br />properties" O'. 28). lrideed,`this section~of the LRRCP.inakes.repeated reference to the` <br />traditional and "historic' single family pattern of housing in theanon-coinrnercial.parts,ofthe <br />area and the 'appficable'"concepts" and "goals" of`"preserv[ing] ,and reinforc[ing]" it (25 'and 28 <br />see also.24, •27). Here again, the OMC.PUD. does riot follow ihe.pnoritres and goals of the <br />Concept Plan.., <br />*Oakleigh Lane.is a'n-excellent example.of the~si.ngle-'family character of the Lower Riuer'Road <br />area, nearly all the,horries on 0akleigh Lurie are single'-family;homes, l bcilding (1'.30 `<12 <br />Oaklergh) rs a rental property with just.2 apartments;,another (;110 Oakleigh)-has:a mother-in=law, <br />apartment. The`O1VIC`:projecf; with;its`marry multi-family properties; i5 oiit of character with the, <br />street in a'wayparticularly:dis'couragedby-.the Concept, Plan, <br />Incompabilzties with EC aiid Lc code; governing Greenw y Development Permit Approval <br />(LC 10=32115; EC Q800 <br />Development Permits on larid that belongs to 'the :Willametfe :Ri Ver GreenNy a~y are; governefl in <br />Lane CQuntybyspecral code: outlined at LC 10=322 15. The code states Ghat any change-of-use. <br />permits "°shall requue: that the proposed intens fication;:change of use, or•developn ent conforms <br />'to the following criteria, guidelines; and;setback;requirement":(T0-322.1.5).. The OMC PUD,is <br />incompatible with several of the..Guidelines of this code:, <br />*Guideline 10-322.1'5(d) affrms the principle to'"Preserve areas ' f annual' ffoodi ig -floodplains;' <br />and-Wetlands" <br />