• EC 9.8320(13): The proposed development shall be reasonably compatible and <br />harmonious with adjacent and nearby land uses. <br />The'proposed PUD by itself will generate almost the same amount of traffic (daily <br />round trips) as all of the current residents of Oakleigh Lane combined. The proposed <br />PUD by itself will also create double the impacts (arising from increased "pass-bys") <br />as all of the current residents of Oakleigh Lane combined. On the face of it a single <br />development that has such a disproportionately large traffic impact compared to the <br />impacts each of the single-family households that line Oakleigh Lane has, cannot <br />reasonably be considered "compatible" or "harmonious" with those nearby uses. <br />The record contains no evidence or analysis to demonstrate otherwise. <br />Further, the evidence demonstrates that the increased traffic generated if the PUD <br />were approved would be significantly inharmonious with the existing single-family <br />residential uses the border Oakleigh Lane by creating unsafe conditions for the <br />current residents' vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle use of Oakleigh Lane. <br />For the reasons cited above, the application must be denied. <br />Submitted by, <br />PC4,4,4 1 eO* <br />Paul Conte <br />October 9, 2013 <br />October 9, 2013 Conte testimony re PUD 13-1 23 1 P a g e <br />