LUBA RET. EXT 2014-001 VOL 3 of 3

TO: Eugene Hearing Official Eugene Planning & Development Atrium Building 99 West 10th Avenue Eugene, OR 97401 RE: Citizen Comment Document Regarding the OAKLEIGH MEADOWS CO-HOUSING Tentative Planned Unit Development (PDT 13-0001) & Willamette Greenway Permit (WG 13-0001) Dear Hearing Official, I object to the proposed PUD for all of the reasons stated in the Comments of Lauren Regan and Bryn Thoms, and all additional objections incorporated by reference into that comment. Please Add Gentlemen, in the beginning this "Oakleigh Meadows Co-Housing" henceforth O referred to as "OMC" was pitched to our Oakleigh Lane & McClure Lane neighborhoods as a 8 to 10 unit co-housing experiment. We had frequent; every week or two, contact with David Adee as he was trying to sell the.concept and get "buy in" from the neighborhood. To me the project seemed plausible at that level of density. His tentative plan seemed reasonable to me though many in the neighborhood were opposed to it. As time went by.we were no longer hearing from David and then come to find out he had handed off the project to a California Developer and a "Project Manager". Now, only by word on the grapevine, we find the project is planned at 28 to 32 units. Clearly a bait & switch by 3 times. As time has gone on I have heard many descriptions of the project in less than a forthright way. 1.) An effort to bring the neighborhood together. Poppycock OMC has not dealt with the neighborhood in an honest and honorable way. Though agreeing to "mediation" they have sent people who for the most part have stonewalled the process. 2.) . OMC referred to having a development that was going to save the cedars along Oakleigh Lane. Turns out those cedars are not even on their property. 3.) Reference was made to a request for an easement on. the West property line of OMC by the Brandts, the property O 1058