My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LUBA RET. EX 076/077 RE-E (2)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
LUBA RET. EX 076/077 RE-E (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:31 PM
Creation date
3/28/2017 10:30:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
LUBA Materials
Document_Date
10/9/2013
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' • "We don't know the answers to that at this time" <br />' I finally asked if they could at least write down our questions and get back to us with answers. One of <br />the OMC members pulled out a scrap of paper from her purse and jotted down a few things. <br />' Neither I nor my neighbor was ever contacted again with answers to our questions, nor were there any <br />follow ups with any of the neighbors over the concerns raised. In the past 30 days and talking to other <br />neighbors, they all had similar situations at this annex "meeting". <br />The site plans started being submitted to the city a short 2 months after this meeting at the annex with <br />no changes to address the concerns raised and no follow up with the neighbors! This was just another <br />thing to check off of their required list of "to do" items before they could submit. They did not care <br />what we had to say and they changed absolutely nothing to address our concerns. <br />In the past 30 days, we have been told by some of the members of OMC that Chuck Durrett and Katie <br />McCammett, the California architect/mentor and Financial adviser of this project, told the CIVIC group <br />that they should ignore the neighbor's concerns, and that this always happens. They told CIVIC the <br />neighbors will like you once you are here. This shows exactly why our questions and concerns were <br />completely ignored and that NOT ONE thing brought up by neighbors was put into consideration when <br />developing this plan. <br />In addition, in the past 30 days, OMC offered to do some mediation with our group. We got hopeful and <br />' participated in 2 informal and 2 formal mediations sessions with a paid mediator. Splitting the cost with <br />OMC - over $200 out of the neighborhoods pocket. However, we were hopeful that OMC was finally <br />going to listen to our concerns. <br />Unfortunately, after 4 meetings and countless hours of conversations and wasted time, OMC informed <br />us that they would be making no concessions and everything was moving forward as planned. Once <br />again, there was no respect for the neighborhood or any consideration given to our very real concerns. <br />Just wasted time and money. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.