Fill/Floodplain <br />The application has no information regarding fill below the 100 yr floodplain, base flood elevation (BFE). <br />Building 2, 4, and 7 will require the grade to be brought up to above 401 ft above mean sea level (amsl). <br />Based on some rough calculations, about 2500 cubic yards of fill will be required to bring the grade to <br />' BFE. There has been no discussion of this in the application. The City Staff Report conditions the <br />recommendation to approve the final PUD with some form of agreement that the grade will be brought to <br />BFE or higher. <br />Building 2's eastern edge is located directly on the west side of the sanitary sewer easement. The grade <br />beneath the east edge of the building must be raised 3 to 4 feet. With a standard geotechnical slope that <br />would support the building, the fill would be required to be placed on the easement. If and when the City <br />' needs to repair the sewer, would the building need to have temporary shoring to support the building <br />during excavation of the sewer? If so, who would pay for it? The City of Eugene or the applicant? This <br />may appear to be a somewhat minimal burden on the City, but it shows yet another area where the <br />' applicant has pushed the development to the limits and beyond. If this setback encroachment is added to <br />the rest of the setback encroachments the cumulative effect is not minimal. In addition, movement of the <br />garages off the west property line 5 feet to comply with the safety setback, would push the whole project <br />' 5 ft further out into the floodplain and Building 2 would be partially in the sewer easement. This is not <br />acceptable to the City. <br />' In order to get about 2500 cubic yards of fill to the site, it will take about 125 to 150 trucks (and trailer). <br />As pointed out in the traffic section, Oakleigh is not designed to take the excess traffic, let alone the <br />weight from that many dump trucks. If repairs to the surface of Oakleigh are needed, who will pay for <br />that? Construction implementation will not be a minimal impact to the neighborhood. There is not <br />enough evidence to show how the project will comply with Eugene City Code. <br />Greenwav <br />OMC is applying for a Willamette Greenway permit (EC 9.8800) for a Land Use Change for the whole <br />project site (TL 5500 and TL 400) for the proposed PUD. <br />The Hearings Official should reject this permit application based on its incompatibility with principles of <br />area development laid out in the Lower River Road Concept Plan and with the guidelines laid out in the <br />EC 9.8800, presented in and the intent of Statewide Planning Goal 15. <br />Incompatibilities with the Lower River Road Concept Plan <br />The Lower River Road Concept Plan was prepared by the City of Eugene in extensive consultation <br />' with a Community Advisory Committee, specially formed for that purpose in 2007. The Lower River <br />Road Concept Plan was acknowledged by the Eugene Planning Commission on June 22, 2009. The plan <br />establishes an approach to balancing conservation, mixed use development (including some medium and <br />' high-density development), and improved transit in the Lower River Road area. <br />The Concept Plan offers several principles that the OMC PUD. First, the OMC PUD asks for housing <br />density at the maximum allowable density on the site at the very end of Oakleigh Lane - as far as it is <br />possible to be from River Road, and as close as it is possible to get to the river and to publicly-owned <br />Greenway lands (the lot includes privately-owned Greenway land). <br />Page 13 of 20 <br />