My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LUBA RET. EX 076/077 RE-H
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
LUBA RET. EX 076/077 RE-H
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:32 PM
Creation date
3/28/2017 9:27:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
LUBA Materials
Document_Date
8/31/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Request to Submit Testimony re PDT 13-1 <br />and Precautionary Objections <br />August 20, 2015 <br />Eugene Planning Commission <br />c/o Gabe Flock, Planner <br />City of Eugene <br />99 West 10th Avenue, <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />Submitted by: Paul Conte <br />.1461 W. 101h Ave. <br />Eugene, OR 97402 <br />Re: City File No. PDT 13-1; Oakleigh PUD <br />Testimony for re-opened record <br />Dear Commissioners: <br />I am requesting to be allowed to submit testimony, including evidence and argument, into the record for <br />the above mentioned case. <br />On August 17, 2015, the Eugene Planning Commission (EPC) voted to re-open the record. However, the <br />EPC limited who could submit testimony to the applicant, Simon Trautman, and their respective <br />representatives. <br />ORS 197.763(7) requires: <br />When a local governing body, planning commission, hearings body or hearings officer reopens a <br />record to admit new evidence, arguments or testimony, any person may raise new issues which <br />relate to the 'new evidence, arguments, testimony or criteria for decision-making which apply to <br />the matter at issue. (Emphasis added.) <br />Allowing the applicant and Mr. Trautman to submit additional evidence and argument without also <br />allowing me and other participants in this matter to submit testimony would be unfair and prejudice my <br />substantial rights. <br />As a precautionary measure, I am objecting to the EPC rejecting my forthcoming testimony, including new <br />evidence submitted by August 31, 2015 and arguments submitted by the deadline set by the EPC. <br />Respectfully submitted, . <br />C(` evv_~ <br />Paul Conte <br />239 : <br />0 <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.