Baker: Including,.not limited to, but including, so it doesn't exclude those. <br />Nystrom leans across the table and whispers privately to Davies: "Brand new issues raised, too." <br />Davies whispers back: "I know." <br />Nystrom whispers to Davies: "You might want to say that." <br />Davies (to Planning Commissioners): I'm having some concern about the breadth of that motion, not just <br />safety but it brings everything all up. And it sounds like the issue that we've been talking about is the <br />right-of-way issue. [sic Baker's motion was explicitly about the pavement width, as well as right-of-way.] <br />I'd like you to at least have some discussion about how broad that motion should be. <br />1:36:00 <br />Barofsky: Well, two things now that you mention that. Yes, I believe that I would like the record to be <br />open for clarity on the right-of-way, pavement widths and whether or not the pavement is available for <br />safe passage on Oakleigh Lane. <br />And the second part of why I originally had my hand up was because I was wondering what is an <br />appropriate timeframe. I mean I know that normally we say a week. For me, I would like to make it as <br />short as possible, but yet give both parties a chance to do well-reasoned and thought out and perhaps <br />even survey things. So I would ask staff for some <br />Davies comments and then says: I think we need both sides submitting new evidence and then <br />response to that evidence and final rebuttal by applicant. I think the last two should be short. The first <br />probably longer. <br />• <br />Mills: I'm going to suggest another area where there might be a need or benefit from additional • <br />information, and that's related to parking on Oakleigh. It's been an issue that's been raised. The street's <br />been partially blocked. Staff conditioned their decree that it's a safe street provided it is not blocked. <br />We have no information on that. <br />I don't know how you get that; whether somebody has to go out there during the time period and doing <br />some surveying whether blockage is occurring or not. It's a question that I have. I mean, because to me <br />it affects directly to staff's declaration that the street is safe, if that is the case. If that's not the case then <br />it's a question. So I'm just suggesting that. <br />1:39:19 <br />Baker: That was really my concern that by talking about traffic safety more general, is I wanted to be <br />concerned about parking because it was noted in several places both in the testimony and also by the <br />public agencies that it was a concern. <br />1:39:37 <br />Taylor: So Commissioner Baker, you brought up an initial motion <br />Baker: I want to defer it and let Commissioner Barofsky <br />Taylor talking over Baker: Let's restate <br />Davies interjecting: Can I restate? <br />Taylor: Yeah, restate. That'd be great restate the motion. <br />1:39:55 <br />r 1 <br />U <br />45 <br />