My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LUBA RET. EX 076/077 RE-E
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
LUBA RET. EX 076/077 RE-E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:32 PM
Creation date
3/28/2017 9:26:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
LUBA Materials
Document_Date
8/31/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Community stakeholder groups should systematically proceed through the <br />Checklist checklist below as part of their decision making process. Also, your commu- <br />IV] nity may wish to add to this checklist. The format of the checklist includes <br />room for comments: encourage stakeholders to make notes regarding their <br />concerns and record decisions about how the items in the checklist have been <br />addressed. <br />The factors are interrelated and are best considered together. The items are <br />grouped by category in a logical order, but are not weighted. <br />U <br />Community Process/Decision-Making <br />F-I Good City Department Working Relations <br />Develop good, close working relationships between the fire/ <br />emergency response professionals, public works, building <br />officials, land use and transportation planners, engineers, and <br />other large vehicle operators. The goal is to achieve trusting <br />working relationships that lead to effective accommodation of <br />each other's needs related to agreements about neighborhood <br />street standards. <br />Consistency of Ordinances <br />Review all applicable codes and ordinances and make them <br />consistent with the narrow neighborhood street standards you <br />are adopting. Consider performance-based codes and ordi- <br />nances to address the larger development issues, of which <br />street design is just one part. Amend ordinances only when you <br />have the concurrence of emergency and large service vehicle <br />providers. <br />y w neighborhood streets by code and <br />ordinance'rather than requiring a special process, such as a <br />variance or planned unit development. Or consider a modification <br />process similar to the City of Beaverton's that uses a multi- <br />disciplinary committee review and approval process during the <br />development review process. See Appendix A formore info. <br />❑ Uniformly Allowed <br />Uniform) allow nano <br />❑ Community Process <br />Determine what your community process will be for developing <br />and adopting neighborhood street standards including following <br />legal requirements, gaining political support, and encouraging <br />public education and involvement. Teamwork and involvement <br />of all large vehicle service providers is a critical component for <br />success. Consider the potential benefits of narrow streets, such <br />as slower traffic, less stormwater runoff, and lower costs. Look <br />for ways to minimize the risk that fire apparatus will not be able <br />to quickly access an emergency and minimize possible inconve- <br />nience for other large vehicles. Formore information see Chapter <br />V, A'CommunityProcess forAdoptingStandards <br />Notes <br />10 <br />100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.