LUBA 076/077 VOL 2 of 2 - Laserfiche WebLink

From: DAVIES Anne C [mailto:Anne.C.Davies@ci.eugene.or.usl Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 2:01 PM To: William Kabeiseman <billkab@gsblaw.com> • Cc: FLOCK Gabriel <Gabriel.Flock@ci.eugene.or.us> Subject: RE: Oakleigh Meadows Bill-here is my summary to you, in which I stated that the second open record period was open for "evidence in response" to the evidence submitted on August 31't. Anne From: William Kabeiseman [mailto:billkab(agsblaw.com] Sent: Friday,.August 21, 2015 11:03 AM To: DAVIES Anne C Subject: RE: Oakleigh Meadows Thanks for the summary. Bill From: DAVIES Anne C f mailto:Anne.C.Davies@ci.eugene.or.us] Sent: Friday, August 21, 201510:52 AM To: William Kabeiseman <billkab@gsblaw.com> Subject: RE: Oakleigh Meadows • Bill-This is just a summary; you will want to watch the webcast to be certain of the scope and deadlines forthe re- opening of the record. http://ceipps.eugene-or.gov/PCWEBCAST/WEBCAST/Play.aspx?mid=669. The record is opened only to Trautman, Trautman's legal representative, the Applicant and the applicant's legal representative. The scope of evidence and argument to. be submitted is limited to information that provides "clarity on right of way pavement widths and whether pavement is available for safe passage on Oakleigh Lane." The record is open initially until close of business on August 31st for new evidence on that issue; evidence in response to those submittals are due by close of business on September 4t'; final rebuttal by applicant is due by September 11. Anne From. William Kabeiseman [mailto:billkab@gsblaw.coml Sent: Friday, August 21,'2015 10:36 AM To: DAVIES Anne C Subject: Oakleigh Meadows Acme, I understand that the Planning Commission re-opened the record in some limited fashion on the Oakleigh Meadows matter and I want to make sure I understand the limitations that apply • - will the City be issuing a notice or some other indication of the scope of the re-opening, who 2 341 461