FLOCK Gabriel <br />From: William Kabeiseman <billkab@gsblaw.com> <br />Sent: Wednesday, September. 09, 2015 10:28 PM <br />To: DAVIES Anne C <br />Cc: FLOCK Gabriel <br />Subject: RE: Oakleigh Meadows <br />Attachments: August 17 2015 EPC Transcript (7288313 v 1).pdf <br />Anne, <br />Thanks for the response; I note that in the summary that you sent me on August 21, 2015, you <br />specifically indicated that it was "just a summary, and directed me to "watch the webcast to be <br />certain of the scope and deadlines for the re-opening of tlite record.,, Based on your e-mail, <br />that was the direction that we took. Attached is the transcript from that meeting and the <br />motion that was adopted talks only about rebuttal - I don't see any indication that new <br />evidence would be coming in on the 2"`i submittal period. Based on that discussion, I believe <br />that the applicant was limited only to rebuttal, as stated in the motion. <br />• Again, I'm happy to discuss if you would like. <br />Bill <br />From: DAVIES Anne C (mailto:Anne.C.Davies(@ci.eueene.or.us] <br />Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 2:01 PM <br />-To: William Kabeiseman <billkab@gsblaw.com> <br />Cc: FLOCK Gabriel <Gabriel.Flock@ci.eugene.or.us> <br />Subject: RE: Oakleigh Meadows <br />Bill-here is my summary to you, in which I stated that the second open record period was open for "evidence. in <br />response" to the evidence submitted on August 31'~`. . <br />Anne <br />From: William Kabeiseman fmailto:billkab(&gsblaw.coml <br />Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 11:03 AM <br />To: DAVIES Anne C <br />Subject: RE: Oakleigh Meadows <br />• Thanks for the summary. <br />325 <br />445 <br />