DAVIES Anne C <br />O From: William Kabeiseman <billkab@gsblaw.com> <br />Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 11:03 AM <br />To: DAVIES Anne C <br />Subject: RE: Oakleigh Meadows <br />Thanks for the summary. <br />Bill <br />From: DAVIES Anne C [mailto:Anne.C.Davies@ci.eueene.or.us] <br />Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 10:52 AM <br />To: William Kabeiseman <billkab@gsblaw.com> <br />Subject: RE: Oakleigh Meadows - <br />Bill-This is just a summary; you will want to watch the webcast to be certain of the scope and deadlines for the re- <br />opening of the record. http://ceapps.eugene-or.gov/PCWEBCAST/WEBCAST/Play.aspx?mid=669. The record is opened <br />only to Trautman, Trautman's legal representative, the Applicant and the applicant's legal representative. The scope of <br />evidence.and argument to be submitted is limited to information that provides "clarity on right of way pavement widths <br />and whether pavement is available. for safe passage on Oakleigh Lane." The record is open initially until close of <br />business on August 31St for new evidence on that issue; evidence in response to those submittals are due by close of <br />• business on September 4th; final rebuttal by applicant is due by September 11. <br />Anne <br />From: William Kabeiseman [mailto:billkab(u)gsblaw.coml <br />Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 10:36 AM <br />To: DAVIES Anne C <br />Subject: Oakleigh Meadows <br />Anne, <br />I understand that the Planning Commission re-opened the record in some limited fashion on <br />the Oakleigh Meadows matter and I want to make sure I understand the limitations that apply <br />- will the City be issuing a, notice or some other indication of the scope of the re-opening, who <br />may submit testimony and the date and time of deadlines for submitting evidence, rebuttal <br />and applicant's final response? <br />Thanks, <br />• <br />i <br />323 <br />443 <br />