Eugene Planning Commission <br />September 11, 2015 <br />Page 14 <br />Works. -comments are substantial evidence of the lack of any documented <br />transportation issue, or LOS concern. Moreover, Traffic Engineer Michael Weishar <br />independently evaluated crash records from the Oregon Department of <br />Transportation and the City of Eugene and found no reported crashes on Oakleigh <br />Lane or its intersection with River Road. To the extent further support is needed, his <br />uncontroverted expert opinion clearly establishes that the Oakleigh Lane has adequate <br />capacity to accommodate trips from the development. Accordingly, this issue should <br />be affirmed on remand. <br />As is set forth in detail above, OMC has clearly established that its proposed <br />PUD will provide "safe and adequate transportation' systems" through compliance <br />with the provisions of EC 9.8320(5), and the Planning Commission should affirm its <br />prior decision on this issue. <br />4. OMC Will -Not Be An Impediment to Emergency Response Under EC <br />9.8320(6)., <br />The opponents also urge that off-site traffic will cause impediments to <br />emergency response in violation of EC 9.8320(6). However, as has been previously <br />determined by the City and by LUBA, the PUD will not be an impediment to <br />emergency response under EC 9.8320(6). <br />• The City Hearings Official adopted the following findings: <br />"With regard to the provision of emergency vehicle response, the applicant <br />states the proposed access on Oakleigh Lane and the hammerhead turnaround <br />within the development site is sufficient for the proposed development. <br />Referral comments from Public Works staff indicate that this on-site turnaround <br />must provide for emergency vehicle access by being within a temporary <br />emergency access easement. The proposed turnaround area meets the <br />dimension requirements for a hammerhead. Referral comments from the Fire <br />Marshal state no concern with the turnaround. The permanent turnaround is <br />anticipated at the end of Oakleigh Lane, when properties to the north further <br />develop. As recommended previously at EC 9.8320(5)(a), the applicant is <br />required to dedicate right-of-way for the portion of the future turnaround that <br />would overlap the subject property. Based on these findings, the following <br />condition of approval is necessary: <br />Prior to final PUD approval, the applicant shall dedicate a temporary <br />emergency vehicle access easement over the on-site hammerhead and the <br />access drive from Oakleigh Lane, and show this easement of the final PUD <br />plans." Hearings Official Decision, p. 30; LUBA Rec. 50. <br />The Planning Commission affirmed the Hearings Official and incorporated these <br />findings stating: <br />• <br />317 <br />437 <br />