My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LUBA 076/077 VOL 2 of 2
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
LUBA 076/077 VOL 2 of 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:33 PM
Creation date
3/27/2017 10:26:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
LUBA Materials
Document_Date
11/16/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
412
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Willard C. Dixon Architect, LLC <br />300 Blair Blvd. <br />Eugene, OR. 97402-4150 <br />(541) 689-3548 office <br />1 (541) 982-2273 fax (all #'s) <br />(541) 868-5960 cell <br />www.willard6dixon.com <br />19 June, 2014 <br />City of Eugene <br />Attn: Mark Whitmill, Assistant Building Official <br />99 W. l& Avenue <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />RE: PROJECT: <br />TAX MAP <br />FILE <br />Oakleigh Meadow Cohousing <br />17 04 2413 Lot 400 / 17 04 24 24 Lot 551 <br />PC 14-33 (A permit number has not yet <br />assigned) <br />Dear Mark: <br />This is a supplemental narrative to our AM&M application for submittal! of Construction <br />Documents pertaining to the `Oakleigh Cohousing' Planned Unit Development. <br />Alternate Material(s),& Method(s) <br />Approval Application, Cont. <br />I <br />We are proposing that the Oakleigh Meadow Cohousing project meet the intent of <br />the Oregon Residential Specialty Code (ORSC) in regards to "separate buildings" <br />and fire/life safety, and exceed the minimum requirements found therein. As per <br />R302.2, each townhouse shall be considered a separate building and shall be <br />separated by a 2-hour fire-resistance-rated wall assembly. By providing the same <br />2-hour fire separations at the two-family (stacked unit) dwellings, we propose that <br />we meet the intent of the Residential Code while also being consistent with the <br />OSSC in regards to separate buildings. We are asking the City to consider the <br />stacked flats as a two-family dwelling "separate building," separated from <br />adjacent townhouses and/or other two-family dwellings with the same 2-hour <br />party wall construction required to separate individual townhouses, and with fire <br />separations in excess of the minimum requirements for two-famiily. dwellings as <br />per R302.3, where it states that two-family dwellings shall be separated from each <br />-1- <br />297 <br />288 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />408 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.