(b) Prior acceptance by the appropriate public agency of a written commitment by the <br />applicant or other party to provide private services and facilities. <br />(c) A written commitment by the applicant or other party to provide for offsetting all <br />added public costs or early commitment of public funds made necessary by <br />development, submitted on a form acceptable to the city manager. <br />As explained above, adequate public fire and,emergency services are not available to the site <br />because there is no approved fire apparatus access road. \ <br />The portions of testimony above related to the Eugene Fire Code requirements for fire <br />apparatus access roads are incorporated herein by reference. <br />The Hearings Official erred by failing to correctly assess the lack of adequate fire and <br />emergency services. . <br />EC 9.8320(11)(k) states: <br />(11) The PUD complies with all of the following: <br />(k) All other applicable development standards for features explicitly included in the . . <br />application except where the applicant has shown that a proposed noncompliance is <br />consistent with the purposes set out in EC 9.8300 Purpose of Planned Unit <br />Development. <br />The application explicitly includes a hammerhead turnaround for use by emergency vehicles. <br />This turnaround must meet the standards in the Eugene Fire Code, including being connected <br />to a fire station by a fire apparatus access road. It fails to meet this requirement, as described <br />above. <br />The application also includes a corner where the driveway meets Oakleigh Lane. This corner <br />has a radius that fails to meet the minimum turning radius for a fire apparatus, as required by <br />Eugene Fire Code. <br />The application does not provide complete dimensions for all buildings, particularly the <br />"Common" building and no analysis was provided as to whether or not the height of any <br />portion of a building-would be greater than 30 feet, this requiring additional measures to <br />provide for fire apparatus and hose access. The application cannot be approved until this <br />required information is provided and there are findings of compliance with the applicable <br />Eugene Fire Code provisions. <br />The Hearings Official erred by failing to correctly assess the fire apparatus access road <br />standards applicable to features explicitly included in the application. <br />For these reasons, this application must be denied, <br />Respectfully, <br />Sin - rautm~n <br />Trautman Appeal Testimony PDT 13-1 Page 17 <br />August 31, 2015 <br />42 <br />162 <br />