My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comment (4)
>
OnTrack
>
Z
>
2016
>
Z 16-5
>
Public Comment (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2017 9:32:44 AM
Creation date
3/17/2017 3:52:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
Z
File Year
16
File Sequence Number
5
Application Name
Furtick, Don
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
3/17/2017
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regarding the Branch Engineering written statement for annexation TM 18-03-09-2, TL 500 (11/29/2016), <br />point 42, bullet 5 suggests an access north from 30th Avenue using TL 301. This has been disallowed by the <br />city and county because it effectively connects 30th Ave to Spring and Central. The Laurel Hill Valley <br />Refinement Plan disallows a connection between 30th and the Glenwood Interchange which could be the next <br />step. The other possible access would be south on TL 301 which is too steep. <br />We're confused by a public process that doesn't notify neighbor's until this late and city planning requires a <br />response ten days ahead of the meeting with no written or oral input the day of the meeting? We love that the <br />city had the foresight to protect its' Ridgeline, forested areas and wildlife through refinement plans. <br />Katie Dixon & Bill Blix <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.