My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPLICATION MATERIALS
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
APPLICATION MATERIALS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2017 4:04:22 PM
Creation date
3/7/2017 10:01:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Application Materials
Document_Date
3/3/2017
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Capital Hill PUD Page 24 of 63 <br />Planned Unit Development Application - Tentative Stage - Written Statement <br />March 3, 2017 <br />property owners will not be allowed to build in those areas, further increasing the buffer between the <br />development and the Ribbon Trail. In this manner, the Capital Hill PUD ensures preservation of those <br />areas most visibly part of the entire community. <br />The project is proposing a connection from the development to the Ribbon Trail on a parcel designated <br />as Tract E. (See Site Plan). It is the intention of the owner to dedicate this portion to the City of Eugene <br />Parks Department. The property already connects directly to Hendricks Park to the north along Capital <br />Drive. This is a well-traveled connection by pedestrians and cyclists alike. With this additional <br />connection and the proximity of the development to the existing 80+ acre recreational area called <br />Hendricks Park, the development is ensuring provision of recreational areas in close proximity to major <br />concentrations of population, as well as providing connective trails between major recreational areas. <br />Three large areas of preserved property extend east-west from the east boundary of the property. <br />These 3 areas will serve to provide connective passageways for wildlife. In addition, the CCRs for the <br />project will prohibit the construction of fences between individual lots. So for all intents and purposes, <br />the site remains open to all wildlife and acts as a large wildlife corridor. <br />In this manner, the proposed PUD will comply with four of the relevant purposes of the stated Ridgeline <br />Park section of the South Hill Study. <br />(2) Density Section - Specific Recommendations <br />(b) That in the area east of Friendly Street the maximum level of new development per gross acre <br />be limited to 5 units per acre (the maximum figure of 5 dwelling units per gross acre being <br />subject to positive findings under the planned unit development criteria). <br />There are 13.61 gross acres (13.10 net acres) within this development site. There are 37 to 43 <br />units proposed or a density of 2.72 to 3.16 units per acre. This density is well below the 5 units <br />per acre or 65 units that could potentially be allowed on this development site. <br />(3) Development Standards - Specific Recommendations <br />(b) That planned unit development procedures shall be utilized for the following purposes: <br />1. To encourage clustering of development in areas characterized by: <br />a. Shallowest slopes <br />b. Lowest elevations <br />c. Least amount of vegetation <br />d. Least amount of visual impact. <br />To begin this discussion, we will point out that these are recommendations only and will <br />continue that emphasis throughout this discussion. While well-intended, the South Hills <br />Study presumes that hills are steepest at the top and shallower at the bottom. In fact, <br />the geomorphology in this area is one of rolling hills - not mountain peaks. Elevated <br />areas are more likely to be rounded at the top and steeper on the lower elevations. Of <br />course that depends on where the property boundary is located, which is also arbitrary <br />with respect to these recommendations. <br />In the case of this development site, the highest elevations contain the shallowest <br />slopes and the lowest to middle elevations contain the steepest slopes. The existing <br />development is already at the highest and shallowest areas for very practical reasons. <br />This is the area that was the easiest and least expensive place to build 100 years ago. It <br />more than likely had the best view looking west, as the trees currently west of the <br />development site were not there either. Consequently, the highest elevations on this <br />property have the least amount of vegetation and are dominated by 6 dwelling units, a <br />cultivated vineyard, open areas, and lawn. <br />The existing housing to the south and west has been in existence for long enough that <br />the existing trees on those properties screen much of the view from the development <br />site to the west. By extension, the views from the west onto the development site will be <br />very limited as well. <br />Schirmer Satre Group . 375 West 4 ht Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 • (541) 686-4540 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.