I urban uses with nearby agricultural and forest activities occurring on farm and <br />2 forest lands outside the UGB" and ORS 197.298(3) as a more available <br />3 vehicles for not following the ORS 197.298(1) priorities for including <br />4 exception lands first and including poorer agricultural lands before including <br />5 better agricultural lands than is actually the case. In applying the Goal 14 <br />6 Boundary Location Factors, respondents must do more than identify possible <br />7 environmental, energy, economic or social consequences, and possible <br />8 incompatibilities with agricultural activities if exception lands or poorer quality <br />9 agricultural soils are included according to the ORS 197.298(1) priorities. <br />10 Respondents must establish that such considerations justify deviating from the <br />11 statutory priorities, notwithstanding the legislature's expressed preference for <br />12 those priorities. Respondents should not underestimate the difficulty of making <br />13 such a demonstration. A similar caution is appropriate for attempts to use ORS <br />14 197.298(3) to avoid the ORS 197.298(1) priority scheme. <br />15 The second assignment of error is sustained in part. <br />16 THIRD ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR <br />17 Respondents included Area 8 in the UGB to meet the projected need for <br />18 land for commercial and industrial purposes (employment lands). Area 8 is <br />19 located east of Interstate 5 and includes 106 acres. In their third assignment of <br />Page 47 <br />