I in ORS 197.298(3)(b) and (c), see n 15, the ORS 197.298(3)(b) and (c) bases <br />2 for a finding that higher priority lands are "inadequate" apply in place of <br />3 Factors 1 and 2. That leaves only the Factor 3 "[c]omparative environmental, <br />4 energy, economic, and social consequences" and Factor 4 "[c]ompatibility of <br />5 the proposed urban uses with nearby agricultural and forest activities occurring <br />6 on farm and forest land outside of the UGB" as relevant Goal 14 Boundary <br />7 Location Factors in determining whether higher priority candidate lands are <br />8 "inadequate to accommodate the amount of land" needed as determined by Step <br />9 One. <br />10 If highest priority lands are found to be "adequate to accommodate the <br />11 amount of land needed," a local government moves to Step Three, where the <br />12 local government applies all of the Goal 14 "Boundary Location" factors to <br />13 choose the "best" land within those "available" high priority lands. If highest <br />14 priority lands are not adequate to accommodate the amount of land needed, the <br />15 next lowest priority lands are reviewed for adequacy under Step Two <br />16 (reviewing adequacy under ORS 197.298(3) and Goal 14's consequence and <br />17 compatibility Factors 3 and 4). Then local government repeats the process <br />18 between Step Two and Step Three until the highest priority lands accommodate <br />19 the need in light of Goal 14 factors or until it is determined that a broader study <br />20 area is required to identify a sufficient number of adequate acres. <br />Page 23 <br />