I needs cannot reasonably be accommodated on land already <br />2 inside the urban growth boundary." 16 <br />3 The Court of Appeals explained that "Factors 1 and 2 necessarily require[] <br />4 differentiation of land use types according to their land consumption <br />5 attributes." 244 Or App at 256. For example, high density residential land <br />6 uses consume less land per living unit than low density residential land uses. <br />7 After the amount of land needed is determined, Step Two requires a <br />8 determination whether higher priority candidate lands are adequate under ORS <br />9 197.298. Only if higher priority lands are "inadequate," may lower priority <br />10 candidate lands be included in the UGB to meet identified land needs. 17 The <br />11 adequacy inquiry under Step Two has both a straightforward quantitative part <br />12 (whether there are enough acres of the higher priority land to meet the <br />16 Goal 14 was amended in 2005 and 2006, and in McMinnville the Court of <br />Appeals was concerned with the pre-2005 version of Goal 14. 244 Or App at <br />243. The 2005 and 2006 amendments merely rearranged the substantive <br />provisions for clarification, with some minor wording changes. No party <br />argues the minor changes in wording are significant in this case, and for <br />purposes of this opinion we assume that they are not. The Goal 14 Factors 1 <br />and 2 in McMinnville are now Goal 14 Land Need Factors 1 and 2 quoted <br />above. The Goal 14 Factors 3, 4, 5 and 7 discussed in McMinnville are now <br />Goal 14 Boundary Location Factors 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The Goal 14 <br />Factor 6 identified in McMinnville has been eliminated in the current version of <br />Goal 14. It is similar in substance to ORS 197.298(2). See n 15. All citations <br />to Goal 14 Factors in this opinion are to the current Goal 14 Land Need and <br />Boundary Location Factors. <br />17 ORS 197.298(1)(b), (c) and (d) all require a finding that higher priority <br />lands in the previous subsections of ORS 197.298(1) are "inadequate." See n <br />15. <br />Page 21 <br />