I priority land can be included in the UGB instead of higher priority land, where <br />2 the higher priority land "is found to be inadequate to accommodate the amount <br />3 of land" needed based on any of three reasons. See n 14. Those three reasons <br />4 are: (1) "specific types of identified land needs cannot be reasonably <br />5 accommodated on higher priority lands," (2) "[f]uture urban services could not <br />6 reasonably be provided to higher priority land due to topographical or other <br />7 physical constraints," or (3) "[m]aximum efficiencies of land uses within a <br />acknowledged comprehensive plan for agriculture or <br />forestry, or both. <br />"(2) Higher priority shall be given to land of lower capability as <br />measured by the capability classification system or by cubic <br />foot site class, whichever is appropriate for the current use. <br />"(3) Land of lower priority under subsection (1) of this section <br />may be included in an urban growth boundary if land of <br />higher priority is found to be inadequate to accommodate <br />the amount of land estimated in subsection (1) of this <br />section for one or more of the following reasons: <br />"(a) Specific types of identified land needs cannot be <br />reasonably accommodated on higher priority lands; <br />"(b) Future urban services could not reasonably be <br />provided to the higher priority lands due to <br />topographical or other physical constraints; or <br />"(c) Maximum efficiency of land uses within a proposed <br />urban growth boundary requires inclusion of lower <br />priority lands in order to include or to provide <br />services to higher priority lands." (Emphases added.) <br />Page 19 <br />