I Intervenor contends that petitioners rely on an isolated table in the REA <br />2 and do not consider what follows. According to intervenor, the REA shows <br />3 that the City of Springfield has a deficit of 450 acres for large lot industrial <br />4 development, not 62 available acres. Intervenor contends the REA shows that <br />5 Eugene has determined it needs to expand its UGB to add 457 acres to meet its <br />6 needs and that the 181 acres petitioners identify are already needed to meet <br />7 Eugene's needs. Finally, intervenor contends that the evidence petitioners rely <br />8 on to establish that that 214 acres of land is available in Goshen for large lot <br />9 employment development shows those acres are already developed. <br />10 We agree with intervenor that petitioners have not established that <br />11 respondents failed to adequately consider existing available land to meet <br />12 regional land for large lot employment land needs. <br />13 This subassignment of error is denied. <br />14 FOURTH ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR <br />15 ORS 197.732, Goal 2, Part II; and OAR Chapter 660, Division 4 all <br />16 authorize local governments to take "exceptions" to the statewide planning <br />17 goals. As defined by OAR 660-004-0005(1), <br />18 "An `Exception' is a comprehensive plan provision, including an <br />19 amendment to an acknowledged comprehensive plan, that: <br />20 "(a) Is applicable to specific properties or situations and does not <br />21 establish a planning or zoning policy of general <br />22 applicability; <br />23 "(b) Does not comply with some or all goal requirements <br />24 applicable to the subject properties or situations; and <br />Page 63 <br />