HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff ReportEUGENE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Eugene
Action: Adoption of Resolution Annexing Land to the City of Eugene
(Property Identified as Assessor's Map 18-03-09-20, Tax Lot 500)
(Fur-tick; A 16-10)
Meeting Date: January 23, 2017
Department: Planning and Development
www.eugene-orgov
Agenda Item Number:
Staff Contact: Nicholas R. Gioello
Contact Telephone Number: 541/652-5453
ISSUE STATEMENT
This item is a request to annex approximately 1.65 acres (72,075 square feet) of vacant land
located north of the intersection of East 300 Avenue and Spring Boulevard. The property is
located within the Urban Growth Boundary and is contiguous to the City limits. No public rights-
of-way are proposed for annexation as part of this request. A vicinity map is provided as
Attachment A.
The property is zoned AG Agricultural with /UL Urbanizable Lands Overlay. The Metro Plan and
the Laurel Hill Plan designate the subject property for low density residential use. Annexation will
allow for future development consistent with the property's designation and the Eugene Code.
Specific plans for future development of the site are not included as part of this annexation
application.
BACKGROUND
The Metro Plan provides that ultimately land within the urban growth boundary will be annexed
into the city and provided with a minimum level of urban services. Approval of annexation
requests are based on the criteria at EC 9.7825 which require that (1) the land proposed to be
annexed is within the City's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and is contiguous to the City limits or
separated from City limits only by a right-of-way or water body; (2) the proposed annexation is .
consistent with the applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in any applicable refinement plans
and (3) the proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimal level of key urban
facilities and services can be provided in an orderly, efficient, and timely manner. Draft findings
demonstrating that the annexation request is consistent with these approval criteria are included
as Exhibit C to the draft resolution (Attachment B).
The city's annexation procedures provide for the council to adopt a resolution approving,
modifying and approving, or denying an application for annexation; or provide for the council to
hold a public hearing before consideration of the annexation request.
To provide nearby property owners and residents an opportunity to review and comment on this
annexation request, public notice was provided consistent with Eugene Code requirements. As of
this date, one neighboring property owner, Patrick Holleran, submitted testimony regarding the
proposed annexation (see Attachment D) expressing concerns about potential impacts that future
development may have on his property and the surrounding area. He expresses concern about the
map included with the public notice showing Central Boulevard connecting to 301h Avenue and
Spring Boulevard, noting that it is unpaved and provides no through connection. He also raises
concern about the provision of necessary utilities such as wastewater service, water, power and
access for emergency response. Specifically, he states that he has been approached by the owners'
representatives about obtaining a utility easement through his property and has not agreed to an
easement, which is potentially problematic and likely to have a considerable impact on the land
and other property owners in the area if the easement is not granted. As a result of these concerns
he requests that council defer action until a public hearing can be held.
Staff requested additional information from the City's Public Works Department and the applicant
to assist in responding to Mr. Holleran's testimony (see Attachment Q. Public Works staff
confirms that key urban services can be provided to the subject property in an orderly, efficient
and timely manner within the adjacent city owned area of land consistent with EC 9.7825(3). This
adjacent right-of-way is currently unpaved and any future street or access improvements would
be reviewed for conformance with city standards. Public Works staff also confirms that the lack of
an easement across Mr. Holleran's property is not problematic and does not preclude the
annexation or development of the Furtick property, as there are other feasible alternatives to
provide services. The applicant's representative supplied supplemental information (see
Attachment F) that indicates the applicant will no longer seek any utility service access through
Mr. Holleran's property, and submitted a revised map showing all utility line connections located
within City right-of-way from Central Boulevard to the subject site. Referral comments from other
affected agencies including Lane County Public Works and EWEB also confirm that the property
can he provided with the minimum level of key urban services consistent with the approval
criteria.
Based on this information confirming the minimum level of key urban services can be provided
consistent with the annexation approval criteria, a public hearing is not recommended in this
instance. Additionally, future development of the subject property will be required to meet
applicable Eugene Code standards for public improvements, including streets and utilities, and
any land division proposal (partition or subdivision) for the subject property will provide for
opportunity for public review and comment through a land use application process.
Additional background information regarding this request, including relevant application
materials, is included for reference as Attachment C. A full copy of all materials in the record is
also available at the Permit and Information Center located at 99 West 101h Avenue.
RELATED CITY POLICIES
The Metro Plan contains the policies that are related to this annexation request. The Laurel Hill
Plan and South Hills Study are the refinement plans applicable to the subject property. The
policies applicable to this request are addressed in the Planning Director's findings and
recommendation (Exhibit C to Attachment B).
COUNCIL OPTIONS
City Council may consider the following options:
1. Adopt the draft resolution
2. Adopt the draft resolution with specific modifications as determined by the City Council
3. Deny the draft resolution
4. Defer action until after the council holds a public hearing on the proposed annexation
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
The City Manager recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution by finding that the
request complies with all applicable approval criteria, and that the annexation be approved.
SUGGESTED MOTION
Move to adopt Resolution No. 5183 which approves the proposed annexation request consistent
with the applicable approval criteria.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Draft Annexation Resolution with Exhibits A through C
Exhibit A: Map of Annexation Request
Exhibit B: Legal Description
Exhibit C: Planning Director Findings and Recommendation
C. Application Materials for Annexation Request
D. Public testimony from Patrick Holleran
E. Public Works response to testimony
F. Applicant supplemental information
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Staff Contact: Nicholas R. Gioello
Telephone: 541/682-5453
Staff E-Mail: Nick.r.gioello@ci.euoeiie.or.us
Furt,ck ®on (A 16-10). ATTACHMENTA
o
QA 18
ft° F~ t
EUGENE
Subject Qh~S~ c
Property r ~vJJ`//YY~~-AAJ/J++,//.~'~, F d`.w r..
~lvg
+V a
Et29THAVE, w`'gr;r
~ ~Ltt Subject
Property
a • 6.10.. ~ A,d x
? C 3 t p" ..sX ~i
F
"an T' d
Y.
t 1 _
AVE t~
E,30TH
®R ;V Z
rLe9e r~ ~Y '
O ,S~ubte~ct Property . ®City Limas ' ! laxlots
January 2017
ATTACHNIENT B
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ANNEXING LAND TO THE CITY OF EUGENE
(PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S N1AP 18-03-09-20, TAX LOT
500).
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that:
A. An annexation application was submitted by Donald R Furtick on October 13,
2016, in accordance with the provisions of Section 9.7810 of the Eugene Code, 1971, ("EC") for
annexation to the City of Eugene of the property identified as Assessor's Map 18-03-09-20, Tax
Lot 500.
B. The territory proposed to be annexed is depicted on the map attached as Exhibit A
to this Resolution. The legal description of the property described is attached to this Resolution
as Exhibit B.
C. The City's Planning Director has submitted a written recommendation that the
application be approved based on the criteria of EC 9 7825 The Planning Director's Findings and
Recommendation is attached as Exhibit C.
D. On December 22, 2016, a notice containing the street address and assessor's map
and tax lot number, a description of the land proposed to be annexed, and the Planning Director's
preliminary recommendation was mailed to the applicant, owners and occupants ofproperty within
500 feet of the subject property, and the Laurel Hill Valley Citizens. The notice advised that the
City Council would consider the Plannin, Director's full recommendation on the proposed
annexation on January 23, 2017.
E. After considerin, the Planning Director's recommendation, the City Council finds
that the application should be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. Based on the above findings and the Planning Director's Findings and
Recommendation attached as Exhibit C. which are adopted in support of this Resolution, it is
ordered that the land identified as Assessor's Map 18-03-09-20, Tax Lot 500, depicted on the map
attached as Exhibit A, and described in the attached Exhibit B, is annexed to the City of Eugene.
Resolution - Page 1 of 2
ATTACHNUENT B
Section 2. This Resolution is effective immediately upon its passage by the City Council
The annexation and automatic rezoning of the land from AG/L2. to AG pursuant to EC 9.7320(3)
shall become effective in accordance with State law
The foregoing Resolution adopted the 23ra day of.lanuary, 2017.
City Recorder
Resolution - Pace 2 of
ATTACHMENT B
Exhibit A
LAND ANNEXATION FOR
! f FURTICK
!VW 114. SEC 9, TIES, R3W, WM
EUGENE, LANE COUNTY, OREGON
III l l J. CC
r 1' OCTOBER 10, 2016
CENTRAL BLVD.' J Q E 29Th AVE.
l
TL 300 '
'
;zqo
TL
.
i .
' TL 400
f.
'
X
+J
TL 5
,
1.
J.
TL jO2
TL 1'.
H
O
y
W
ti
VICINITY MAP Nor TO SCALE
TL 700
NOTES
Cf7 U%Ilr L7OUNOARLES SHOWN PER
TFE C.TY DF EUGENE ON-LINE
IWITRACTNE ZONING MAP ON
OCTOBER 6 2016
? SITE 15 CURNENiLY v4C W..
7. NO EASEMENT OR OTHER RECCRCED
RE5WCTfO.VS ARE KNOWN TO EXIST
ON ME VIE
TL Jo3
LEGEND
'Drr LUIS
LANDS BE
/
n;NEYED
anch
=D
GINEERING
.
!7 !C'0
SCALE: =100'
Z \201E\16-209 Funlc4\A.rnevaiior. iL 500\1d-238 nnnenawc SAVE- IQ IF .0 PM IIIJANDA
SC.,I.Ntu
ATTACHMENT B
Exhibit B
CRTanch
GINEERING=
Siccr 1977
Ocrobcr 11, 2016
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ANNEXATION APPLICATION
TAX MAP 18-03-09-2, T.kX LOT 500
Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 16-295:01
BEING all those lands conveyed to Donald R. Furtick and Sylvia Furtick, Co-Trustees of
the Donald R. Furtick and Sykia Furtick Living Trust LTD 10118/13 by that Warranty
Deed recorded on October 3, =016 as Reception Number 2016-048695 in the Lane
County Oregon Official Records: said lands being described as follows:
COMMENCING at the northeast corner of Lot 6. Block 22 of Chula Vista Park, as platted
and recorded in the Lane County Oregon Plat Records; Tl-IENCE along the east boLmdary
of said Lot 6 South 00°06'30" Nest, 397.1 feet to the POINT of BEGINNING; THENCE
continuing along the east boundary or said Lot 6 South 00"06'30" Nest, 300.00 feet to
southeast corner of said Lot 6; THENCE along the south line of said Lot C. South 89'57'3()"
West, 240.00 feet; THENCE North 00'06'30" East, 300.00 feet; THENCE North 89'57'30"
East, 210.00 feet, RETURNING to the POINT of BEGINNING.
REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYOR
OREGON
NOVEMBER 30, 2007
RENEE CLOUGH
69162LS
RENEWAL DATE: 12131117
EUGENE WRW6Fl ELD SALEM KEIZER
310 5," Street, Springfield. OR 97477 1 p 541.746.0637 I f. 541.746.0399 , w v.bran&engmeering.com
ATTACHMENT B 4^
Exhibit C
Planning Director's Findings and Recommendation:
Annexation Request for Furtick, Don
(City File A 16-10)
Application Submitted: October 13, 2016
Applicant: Don Furtick
Location: East 30th Avenue and Spring Boulevard
Subject Property: Tax Lot 500 of Assessor's Map 18-03-09-20
Zoning: AG with Agricultural Zone and /UL Urbanizable Lands Overlay
Representative: Renee Clough, Branch Engineering, 310 511 Street, Springfield, OR 97477; 541-746-0637
Lead City Staff: Nicholas Gioello, City of Eugene Planning Division, 541-682-5453
EVALUATION:
Based on the information provided by the applicant, the City has determined that this request complies
with Eugene Code (EC) Section 9.7805 Annexation - Applicability. As such, it is subject to review and
approval in accordance with the requirements, application criteria and procedures of EC 9.7800 through
9.7835. The applicable approval criteria are presented below in bold typeface with findings and
conclusions following each.
EC 9.7825(1) The land proposed to be annexed is within the City's urban growth boundary and is:
(a) Contiguous to the city limits; or
(b) Separated from the city only by a public right of way or a stream, bay, lake or other
body of water.
Complies
❑ NO
Findings: The annexation area is within the City's urban growth boundary (UGB), and is
VES
contiguous to the City limits, consistent with subsection (a).
EC 9.7825(2) The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in
any applicable refinement plans.
Co
mplies
0
❑ NO
Findings: Several policies from the Metro Plan provide support for this annexation by
YES
encouraging compact urban growth to achieve efficient use of land and urban service
provisions within the UGB, including the following policies from the Growth
Management section (in italic text):
Policy 8. Land within the UGB may be converted from urbanizable to urban only
through annexation to a city when it is found that:
a. A minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided to
the area in an orderly and efficient manner.
b. There will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban
services and facilities. Conversion of urbanizable land to urban shall also
be consistent with the Metro Plan (page 11-C-4).
Furtick. Don (A 16-10) January 2017 Page 1
ATTACHMENT B
Policy 10. Annexation to a city through normal processes shall continue to be the
highest priority (page Il-C-S).
Policy 15. Ultimately, land within the UGB shall be annexed to a city and provided with
the required minimum level of urban facilities and services. While the time
frame for annexation may vary, annexation should occur as land transitions
from urbonizable to urban. (page 11-C-5)
As addressed below under subsection (3), and consistent with these policies, a minimum
level of key urban facilities and services can be provided to the area in an orderly and
efficient manner. This annexation request is proposed by the property owner and is
subject to the City's normal process for consideration of voluntary annexations.
The Metro Plan designates the subject property for low density residential use, and as
such, future rezoning will be required to bring the property's zoning into conformance
with the designation for low density residential use (from AG Agricultural to R-1 Low-
Density Residential). The Laurel Hill Plan and the South Hills Study are the adopted
refinement plans for the subject property, however neither plan includes policies that
would serve as approval criteria for the proposed annexation.
EC 9.7825(3) The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key
urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an
and timely manner.
Z H NO Findings: The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum
YES level of key urban facilities and services can be provided in an orderly, efficient, and
timely manner as detailed below:
Wastewater
There is an 8-inch line within Central Boulevard available to serve the subject property;
the distance from the subject property to the public wastewater line is approximately
450 feet. The public system can be extended by the property owner/developer to serve
the subject property.
Stormwater
Stormwater drainage facilities are not immediately available to the subject property but
can be provided at the time of development consistent with the City's stormwater
regulations.
Transportation
This property has frontage on existing un-improved right-of-way, identified as City
owned Tax Lot 301, Assessor's map 18-03-09-20; this right-of-way is expected to be the
future extension of Spring Boulevard. Consistency with public improvement and street
standards will be evaluated and ensured at the time of development. A Lane County
Facility Permit may also be required for any future connection to Spring Boulevard,
Furtick, Don (A 16-10) January 2017 Page 2
which is under the County's jurisdiction at this location.
H 1 1
Solid Waste
Collection service is provided by private firms. Regional disposal sites and the Short
Mountain Landfill are operated by Lane County.
Water and Electric
EWEB Water staff and Electric staff state no objection to the proposed annexation.
Water and electric services can be extended in accordance with EWEB policies and
procedures.
Public Safety
Police protection can be extended to this site upon annexation consistent with service
provision through the City. Fire protection will be provided by the City of Eugene Fire
Department. Emergency medical services are currently provided on a regional basis by
the cities of Eugene and Springfield to central Lane County and will continue in the same
manner upon annexation.
Parks and Recreation
Parks and recreation programs are provided on a City wide basis. The inclusion of the
subject property in the City is sufficient evidence to demonstrate the minimum level of
this key urban service is met. The site is also conveniently located near the Ribbon Trail,
Hendricks Park and other publicly owned open space along the south hills ridgeline.
Planning and Development Services
Planning and building permit services are provided for all properties located within the
urban growth boundary by the City of Eugene. The Eugene Code, Chapter 9, will provide
the required land use controls for future development of the subject property upon
annexation.
Communications
A variety of other telecommunications providers offer communications services
throughout the Eugene/Springfield area.
Public Schools
The subject property is within the Eugene School District boundary and served by Edison
Elementary School, Roosevelt Middle School, and South Eugene High School.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the above findings, information submitted to date, and the criteria set forth in EC 9.7825, the
proposed annexation is consistent with the applicable approval criteria. A map and legal description
showing the area subject to annexation are included in the application file for reference. The effective
date is set in accordance with state law.
Furtick. Don (A 16-10) January 2017 Page 3
ATTACHMENT B
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
• Upon approval of the annexation, the base zoning of AG Agricultural will remain; however, the
/UL Urbanizable Lands overlay will be automatically removed from the annexation area. City
review is required before development can occur on this lot. Please contact the Permit
Information Center, Planner-on-Duty at 541-682-5377 for more information.
• For information regarding EWEB requirements at the time of development, please contact Bill
Johnson, EWEB Water, at 541-685-7377; Jon Thomas, EWEB Electric, at 541-685-7472; and Lori
Price EWEB Right-of-Way, at 541-685-7366.
• Approval of this annexation does not relieve the applicant from complying with applicable
codes and statutory requirements.
Furtick. Don (A 16-10) January 2017 Page 4
November -5, 21)16
~1WYMN STATF-MENT
ANNEXATION
DA 18-b3-o9-- TL 500
Attachment C
NOV
Branch Engineering Inc. Praiect Va. r6-298:or
s
2 9 21'46 tII
- I t
,41 fans
'T-6INEERING-
,,.5I,.-
This application proposes an annexation For Tax Map tS-o3-o9-2, Tat Lot Soo. The property is
iocatu) inside the Nletru Plan huundari and i, zoned AG Agriculture, t 4th a UL UrbanizaNc
Land Overlay Lone. The subject site is, mrrendy adiacent m City of Eugene incorporated land
(Tax bfap t8-o3-or}2 Tax Lots Zoo and 3ot). The purpose of the annexation is to anew
construction of a nett home should the prapert•. ovrner decide to do so in the future. The. following
describes hoer the proposed annexation confotTnss to Lire Eugene Code:
9.7825 Annexation - Approval Criteria. The city council shall approve, modify and
approve, ar den}' a proposed annexation based on the application's consistenev r.ith the
follouing:
(1) The land proposed to be annexed is within the city's urban a owth bntlndar; and
is:
(a) Contiguous to thecitvlimits; or
(b) Separated front the city unly b.,, a public right of way or a stream, bay, W-,e or
other bod_c of water.
The property to be annercd a within the urban growth boundant and ccntl'ytto:ts
to the city limit (Tax bfap t8-o3-og2 TeLr Lots 2no and Sot i.
(2) The proposed annexation is ConsistUlt with applicable policies in the hfetn Pfau
and in any applicable refinement plans.
The prnperty is u.dthin the ,Metro Plan, the South Hills Shidy and the Lma•eLHill
Plan The Laurel Hili Mun does not have any policies applicable to annexahbtL
Both the Metro Plan and the Soath Hit!, Study require kcy urban facilities end
scruices to be ducidable. (1letro Pim:: Grou'ih~tlanaaement Goat, Findirys and
Polities 8 and tS; South Hills Sh:d~. Urbon SeruireArea Recommendation 2)
• Electrical senrice t` pralrideri by tti4TR: fh~ernearl wires along the nor: h
.side of Central Blvd are available for connection via the city otaned I'ar Lot
,301.
• 46ater sendce is prot•ided by Eh-Th. A tn" water main is atailable jar
connection in trte city owned Tae Lot Sol.
• The CStbr ofEugene currently has an S"uastewater• main in Ce•ntrul Sh-d
available for connection via the city owned 1 avLot;ynl.
Ef:G FNF.: SP?!INf nELn .S-L°PA xn7FK
3 5'" Str>-et. 5pnngftid. OR 47477 1 p' 541.746.3637 ' f: 541.74;.0359 'uwnrk~~nthannneeang.COm
Annexation Written Statement
November 29, 2016
• City of Eugene Fire & ENIS Department is ulready providing service to the
site.
• Access to,30" Avenue Ls available through an extension of Spring Boulevard
in city owned Tai Lot 301. This access route will be to 30th Avenue only for
two reasons: first, the Laurel Hill Plan Transportation Policy 1 disallows a
connection between 30m Avenue and the Glenwood Interchange and second,
u segment of the tai lot near Central Boulevard is approximately a 28%
slope. City design standards have a maximum street slope of 15% with
sections up to 20%for no more than 20o feet. To accomplish these grades
through a section of28% existing slope would require more earthwork than
supported by the South Hills Study. It should be noted that Tat Lot 301 is
street right-of-way because the city's deed (Reel 204,7R, Instrument 9514751)
for Tar Lot 301 states that:
City, by acceptance of this grant, hereby declares that it has jell
knowledge that the subject real property conveyed by this grant was
ucquired with road funds of Lane County and hereby accepts the legal
obligations and restrictions of use of the property for public road
purposes as provided for under Oregon law and this grant.
• The city does not have any storm sewerfacilities in the urea. Therefore, any
future development on the site will need to treat stornuvater on-site, then
detain and release in a munner that mimic current drainage patterns.
Other policies in the Metro Plan and South Hills Study address annexation in the
context of defining the ullowable UGB limits. Since the site is located inside the
UGB it is reasonable to expect that these policies have been met and do not need
to be specifically addressed here.
(3) The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of
key urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in
an orderly, efficient, and timely manner.
As discussed above, public services are in place and readily available to the
parcels proposed fur annexation. Because of the praldmity to the surrounding
urban facilities, services can be provided in an orderly, efficient. and timely
manner.
Branch Engineering, Inc.
Page 2 of 2
Summarv of Urban Service Provision
This form is intended as a guide to assist applicants in demonstrating that a minimum level or
key urban services can be provided to the a- ea proposed for annexation. Space is provided on
this form for you to provide detailed information on service provision Please add additional
pages if necessary to provide details of servicing issues related to the area you arm annexing. To
assist you in providing this information, some contacts are listed below. For large or ditticult to
serve properLies, you may wish to contact a private land use planning consultant to prepare
your application.
Property Owner(s) Name:
Don Furtick
Assessor's Map and Tax Lot Numbers for Properties Proposed for Annexation
(For example: Map 17-03-19-31, Tax Lot 10W
Mal! 18-03-09-20, Tax Lot 700
Wastewater - A]I new development must ccnnect to the wzigevvater (sanitary sewer) system.
Is wastewater service available to serve the area proposed for annexation? (For more
information. contact the Engineering staff at the City of Eugene Permit and Information Center
or call 541-682-8400.)
The property(ies) in this annexation requeot:
X will be served from an existing gravity, wastewater line.
Location and size of existing wasteyater line:
8", Central Blv&
will be served by an extension of ah existing gravity wastr-watrr line.
Where will a wastewater line be extended from? When will it be extended? By whom?
A service line can be extended by the property owner from Central Blvd southerly Lluuugh Lhr
Cirv-owned TL 301. No daie is known at this time.
Stormwater Site plans for all new development must provide for drainage to an approved
system consistent with the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan. City approval for
storm drainage will be required as part of the development process. (For more information,
contact the Engineering staff at the City of Eugene Permit and Information Center or call 541-
682-8400.) .
Is the site currently served by an approved storrrl system?
7 of 4
If yes
location+
If no, how-Mil stormwater'oe handled after development? -
On-site treatment and detention. release to mimic existing drainage patterns.
Streets - What existing streets provde access to this site. List existing streets that provide
access to this site from River Road, the Northwest Expressvay, or BetrGnF
Highway.
301h Ave to Spring Blvd
Will dedication for additional sheet rinht-ef-way be requiredupor further development of this
site?
Yes No Unknown
Will existing stren_ts be extr-nded or new streets [on:tructed upon further development of thr,
it te. !
X Yes No Unknown
(For morn, information. cont..-,a t:ie City of Eugene Public Work.+staif at (532-fi0i 4.)
Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services
Systems Development revenues generated by new development and Ballot Measure 20-30,
which authorized the issuance of $25.3 million in general raver.ue bonds. will helo to fund future
City park acquisition and development in this area and throughout the 6,,i. Please list the parks
and recreation facil!'Lms thot already exist or are planned in the general vicinity of the
propem;(iesl included in this annexation:
Ribbun "frail and Laure1w,-ud Ccdf Course
Key services, defined by the Metropclitan Plan as parks and recreation programs, will be
available to new city residents in this area on an equal basis with residents throughout the city.
Public Safety
Police services - Police protection can be extended to this site upon annexation consistent with
service proviainn thro.ghout thp city.
2 of
For River Road/Santa Clara area-
police services - Police protection can be extended to this site upon annexation
consistent with service provision throughout the- city. Police currently travel along River
Road to piovice service to areas throughout the River Road and Santa Clara area. Infill
annexations and development in this area will increase the efficiency of service delivery
to this area.
Fire one' emergency services (Please indicate which fire district serves subject property.)
Santa Clara - Fire protection services are currently provided to the
subject property by the Santa Clara Rural Fire Protection District.
River Road - Fire and emergency services - Fire protection is currently
provided to the subject property by the River Road Water District under contract
with the City of Eugene. Upon annexation. fire protection will be provided directly
by the City of Eugene Fire & EMS Department.
Emergency medical transport (i.e., ambulance) services are currently provided on a regional
basis by Eugene, Springfield, and lane Rural Fire/Rescue to central lane County, including the
River Road and Santa Clara areas. After annexation, this service will continue to be provided by
the current provider. All ambulance service providers have mutual aid agreements and crevice
back-up service into the other providers' areas.
Planning and Development Services - Planning and building permit services are provided to the
area outside the city limits but within the urban growth boundary by the City of Eugene. This
service would continue after annexation.
EWER (Eugene Water and Electric Board) currently provides water and electric service in the
Eugene area and can provide service to new development in the River Road and Santa Clara
area upon annexation. Some properties In northern Eugene receive electric service from EPUD
(Emerald People's Utility District). Some properties in south Eugene receive electric services
from the Lane Electric Cooperative, please note if this is the case lint your property, ror more
information contact EWER, ph. 434-2411, EPUD, ph. 746-1583 or Lane Electric Co-op, 484-1151.
Electric Service - Which electric company will serve this site' ,
EWI B
Water Service - Please provide the sue and location of the water main closest to your
property. I T,11301 to west .
Solid Waste - Solid waste collection service is provided by private firms. Regional eisposal sites
and the Short Mountain Lan. Hili are operated by fane County.
3 oF4
Natural Cac Northwest Natural Gas can extend service to ncvr d6elopment in this area.
Cnmmunfcations - 115 West Cnmmunirations and a variety of other telecommunications
providers offer communications services throughout the Eugene/Springfield Area.
4d4
Certification of Description
Pursuant to EC 9.7510(7), Annexation Application Requirements, I hereby certify the
metes and bounds description of the real property proposed for annexation closes; and
the map outlining the boundary is a true representation of the description,
Signature:
Land
Print Name: Renee Clough, PLS, PE. AICP
Date: 10/6/16
Seal: REGiSTEP.E0
FRCFESSONAL
LAND SURVEYOR
OREGON
rJOVE A3EP. 30, 2C U;
RENEE CLCUGH
69162LS
RENE NAL CATE: 1251!17
Consent to Annexation
Ccnsent is hereby given to the annex:aticn by the City of Eugene, Oregon of the
fulluwing described real property:
Map and Tax Lot: TM 18-03-04-20, TL 500 Address: none
Legal Description:
All chose I nd.~ conveyed by That Warranly Deed recorded on Ocluher 3. 2006 as Rer.g4ion Number
Z0I6-048695 in Lhe I: ne County Oregon Official Records
In the corporate limits of said city, which is owned by the undersigned
DATED this day of October.
2016.
Donald R. Furtick. Co-Trustee
STATE OF OREGON )
Coun-y of
1ss
1
Donald R. Furtiaand Sylvia Furtick
Living Trust 10/81'13
On this 7"k day of Ov66&c - 20 1 L , hefore me, the undersigned, a
notary public in and For the said county and state, personally appeared the within-named,
P
who is known to me to be the identical individual described herein and who executed the same
freely and voluntarily.
Seat:
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set
my hand and seal the day and year last above
written.
y ,ar}j GFFICIAL Sl'Ak I
EMILY JESSICA PRUSE
(I
Lt
i
.QIS
n'r F:uslICDREGOrl I
VI
.Y GGr:+IAI'SIC,NNO .33358 1
fAY CnVMRSSIUN D(PIRES Df )JRF
i
1E ~t
6
2
-
Notary ublicforOretion
t
.
-
,
My Commission Expires }eyr 2r IL t l;
~ Cv
riu
2
Y
M
d w
d
t ~
in v
`
Z Y C
O IC }
y_ c a
F c
W Is7 O
a c A
O m
Y C
a a
s
o
r
Lo
v
y
c M
c
? m
m
y
N
II
I
11 11
(7
V
~
w
a
~ Vf
N
•u
O O
w s
0
a
°
n
V
V
O
_u L
11
1
II
C 3
O,
m
¢
V
J
C ~
1n
e
v j
`u
a
~ °o
o
In
2 U
C
~
~ o
O
x c
~ O
T
N f~
C
L «
r^
n V
n E
G V
v
~ y
.4
~
a
_ L
U
L `V
r
a
1
t
u
Z
C
4
G
C~
9
C
N =
O
o
~
t
L
C
b
H
^I
P
N
m
z -
n
O
0
N
Y
6
Q
d
U
G
m
O
v
Y C
~ w
1 Q
`o
~1=
U
n
J
J
i C
J V
m
O
m
3
~ a
«
a
C
G ~ y
G
rn
al u 7
v
i
`
a
o a v
-
a
~
- u b
:P
N
~
ry
T
O
= G ~
U
uJi
Q
~
n
C
.J O
'
t~ CL
9
x
` G
~
2
~
a
M
,
v
_
=
L
r
Z
2'
o -p ~J F`
c
-
'y
?y
o
G c ¢ a3
N
~
°
n
` C G
D u
U
1~
a
a
ti ~
~
~
a
L
O
C 0 °
7
L
.
G
L
2
O C L w
W
Y
n
ly
C
N O h
W
LL
'1.
C
~
a
=
v 1
m L
y
.
2
Z
a
o
a~
Q
0.
'
U
i
N
V
«
~
gip
d
_LL
0
~
{L
1'
V
~
x o
C
a
m
.
N
i
~
E
U
L
m
U
O .
.
i
w
o U
G J
L)
i
s
1
.•n a,
j f1
rte. fi
rr ~~J
y
ri
n3
J
L
L`
wo
z N
wa
.o
L" p
t
f
s
G
f'
O 111
5
f
O
O
t...
I: e♦
'
p6
;I
S i r
w r i ~ it r ~ ~i
/ t I
I I'1• LANE COUNTY
;f
' I Property Account Summary
As Of 10l10~20t6 Status: Active
Account No.: '7661783 Altomate Property Number. 180300200000
Account Type: Real Property
-
TCA: 00,401
Silus Address; ADCRESS UNKNU.'M
OR
Legal: Township 18 Range 03 Sec:iac 0; Quarter 20 T_ C0500
Parties:
Role Name B Address
O,vner DONALD R. d SYLIVA FUR rICK LI'u1NG TRUST
500 LONE MAN CREEK DR
WIA,IUEHLEY IX 79675
Ta•payer DONALD R A SYLIVA FURTICK LIb1NG TRUST
SCO LONE VAN CREEK OR
WIMBERLEY TX 78676
Trustee FURTICK SYLVIA
500 LONE MAN CREEK DR
'WIMBERLEY TX 19676
Trustee rURTICK DONALD R
500 LONE MAN CREEK OR
MIABERLEY TX 7957E
Property Values:
.
Value Name 2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
rAKTTL 51* Oi I
514E.225
5147.596
5175.025
1144,219
AVR x54,340
$62.456
550.54'
SW 961
557,166
TVF. $54.347
562.456
5601147
556,931
5 7.195
Property Crwracteristics:
Tax Year Characteristic
Value
2016 Propem7 Class
190 Polerd:al dev vacant
Chanae Property Ratic
1 XX Reside itial
S¢e
r.ES
Cede Spot
N
Fire Patrol Acres
1.65
Neigneomoac
411502
Exemptions:
(L: of Report,
Run: IOt10Q016 1:15:03 Ph1 ASCO037 fPscend_Prod_Rptl Page I
ANNEXATION
r Planning ; CT
Please complete the following application checklist Nate that additional infurnlation inavbe'iequired upon furl-lief
revew in order to adequately address the applicable criteria for approval. if you have any questions about filing out this
application, please contact Planning staff at the Permit and Information Center, phone (591)687-5377, 99 West 10"'
4venue, Eugene.
List all Assessor's Map and Tax Lo: numbers of the property included in the request.
Assessor's Map
Tax Lot Zoning
Acreage
li-1)+-119-2
SQ- ACr lUL
1.65
i
1
I
~ I
i
Property Address: No, address. Eugene, UR. North of E 30th Ave east cl Laurehvood Goli Course.
Plans for Future Development & Permit Number (if applicable):
Public Service Districts:
Name
Parks:
City of Eugene
Electric:
E:ytrP,TV
Water:
EvvtB
Sanitary Sewer
Cit7 of Eugene
Fire:
Tugene Fire and 17,N45
Schools:
Elementary: Edison Middle: Roosevell I High: South Eugene.
Other:
Filing Fee
0 A filing fee must accompany all applications. he fee varies depending upon the type of application and is adjusted
periodically by the City Manager. Check with planning staff at the Permit and Information Center to civermine the
required fee or check website at :vsva,.eee.Cne plannin.e,,nrg
Written Statement [Submit 5 copies)
0 Submit.) detailed written statement describing how thin request i5 consistent with all applicable criteria (Section
9.7825 of the Eugene Coda).
Planning&Development Updated: March '.014
Planning Division
99 N 10" Avenue. Eu3ene, OR 97401
Phwre: 5A 1.542.5 1!7 cr Email:zvgeneplanning~~?'<i.euger zxr.u•. pagr I old
Site Plan Requirements
Submit 3 paper copies and 1 digital copy of a site plan, drawn to on engineer's scale on 8%"x 14" sheet of paper. Site plans
shall include the following information:
Q Show the date & north arrow on site plan.
Q Show the Assessor's Map and Tax Lot number(s) on the site plan.
Q Show a vicinity map on the site plan (vicinity map does not need to be to scale).
Show city limits & UGB (if applicable)
Q Clearly label the affected territory and any public right of ways to be annexed.
Show all adjacent streets, alleys, and accessways.
0 Show all dimensions of existing public utility easements and any other areas restricting use of the parcels, such as
conservation areas, slope easements, access easements, etc.
Q Show the location of all existing structures.
Other Application Requirements (Submit 3 paper copies and 1 digital copy of all)
Q Petition for Annexation form listing all owners, including partial owners, and electors. This form includes the
Certification of Electors which must be signed by the Lane County Elections/Voter Registration Department and also
includes the Verification (Certification) of Property Owners which must be signed by the Lane County Department of
Assessment and Taxation. This farm is required even if the land is vacant.
FX1 Notarized Consent to Annexation form.
Q A legal description of the land proposed for annexation, including any public right of way prepared by a registered
land surveyor. Oregon Revised Statues (ORS) 308.225 requires submittal of a closing metes and bounds description
or subdivision block and lot number description. Please see example of acceptable legal descriptions contained in
the application packet. The legal description must exactly correspond with the map included with the application or
the Assessor's map.
Q Summary of Urban Service Provision form.
IT A county Assessor's cadastral map. (Available at Lane County Assessment & Taxation)
Q Census Information Sheet.
Note: This is not a complete list of requirements. Additional information may be required after further review in order
to adequately address the applicable approval criteria.
Planning & Development
Planning Division
99 W. 1C'"Avenue. Eugene, OR 97401
Phone: 541. Q2 5377 or E-mail:eugeneplanning@ci.eugene.or us
Updated: March 2014
Page 2 of 4
By signing, the undersigned certifies th a/she has read and understood the submittal airements outlined, and that he/she
understands that omission of any listed item may cause delay in processing the application. ' (We), the undersigned,
acknowledge that the information supplied in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my (our! knowledge.
PROPERTY OWNER OF TAX LOT: 'O0
Name (print): Don Fulti&
A.ddres=_: 790 Lorane Hi&wsy Finail:
OR
Phone: '12-847-SIt3 Fait:
Date: l Ol i f 1 fr
PROPERTY OWNER OF TAX LOT:
Flame (print):
Address:
Email:
Phone' Fax:
Signature: Date:
PROPERTY OWNER OF TAX LOT:
Name (print)
Address: Email:
Cllr/Statelzip: Phone: Fax:
Date:
SURVEYOR:
Name (print): Renee Clough, PLS. PL-', .',ICI'
Company/Organization: Branch Engineering, Inc
Address:
City/State,2ip: Springheld,OR 9-;77 Phone 541-746 -063, fax:
E-mail: RateeCCbnnchengincering.com
Signature: Date: 101ifib
Planning & Development
Planning Division
99'A/. nY"AvenLe. E.rgme CA 9- 7401
=horn. rdi 5-',:377 or
Updated: March 20-4
?'cam 3 0, 5
REPRESENTATIVE (If different from Surveyor):
Name
Address:
Phone: Fax:
E-mail:
Signature:
Date:
"Attached additional sheets if necessary.
Planning & Development
Planning Division
99 W. 10" Avenue. Eugene, OR 97401
Phone. 541.682.5377 or E-mail:eugeneplanning@cn.eugene.or.us
Updated: March 2014
Page 4 of 4
Attachment D
GIOELLO Nick R
From:
Pat Holleran <holleran@shannontech.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, January 10, 2017 8:57 PM
To:
GIOELLO Nick R
Cc:
ZELENKA Alan
Subject:
Annexation Issues
Mr. Gioello:
I am writing in regard to the "Notice of Consideration of Annexation Request" regarding the Furtick property which we
received in the mail. My wife and I are the owners of the land adjacent to and north of the property in question.
First, the map which was included in the mailer is incorrect in one respect in that it shows the east-west section of
Central Blvd. in front of our property connecting to the north-south section below and to the northwest of this area. The
east-west section of Central/29th Ave. is an unpaved spur which connects to Spring Blvd. only and provides no other
outlet. It is also important to note that the Furtick property is near 30th Avenue and Spring Blvd. but is not located on
either street.
Second, there are some significant issues related to the development potential of the property in question. This
property is completely surrounded by heavily used city-owned recreational land on the west and south, and by privately
owned land on the east (The Obsidians) and the north (our property). The Furtick land is completely separated from the
developed section of the neighborhood by our property.
This isolation creates some serious challenges in providing basic city services, such as power, water, sewer, Fire Dept.
support, and transportation to this plot. The owner, through a representative, has solicited my wife and I on multiple
occasions to provide a utility easement through our property. We have not yet allowed this easement, and may decide
not to do so. However, without this easement accessing city services will be extraordinarily problematic and will likely
have a considerable impact on the land and the property owners in the adjacent neighborhood. Whatever plans might
exist to thus provide basic city services to the Furtick property have not been presented to or discussed with anyone in
this area.
It is clear that, given the current situation, the annexation requirement that urban facilities and services can be provided
in an orderly, efficient, and timely manner is not close to being met here. Given that situation, and the lack of
information available to potentially affected property owners, including ourselves, the proper action at this time is for
the council to defer a decision until a public hearing on the request can be held.
I would be happy to provide any further information which might be relevant to the consideration of this annexation
request.
-Patrick Holleran
2930 Central Blvd.
Eugene, Oregon 97403
Attachment E
GIOELLO Nick R
Subject: RE: Annexation Issues
----Original Message---
From: FAVREAU EricJ
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 1:51 PM
To: GIOELLO Nick R <Nick.R.Gioello@ci.eugene.or.us>
Cc: GILLESPIE Scott N <Scott.N.Gillespie@ci.eugene.or.us>; SMITH Deanna N <Deanna.N.Smlth@ci.eugene.or.us>
Subject: RE: Annexation Issues
Nick,
I'm hoping to help answer some of the questions that Mr. Holleran asked regarding the Furtick property annexation
During the annexation phase of the project, the applicant does not need to show proposed utility alignments or grades.
Regarding annexation, EC 9.7825(3) states that "The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the
minimum level of key urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an orderly, efficient,
and timely manner." Since the property to the west of the subject property is owned by the City of Eugene, the applicant
may place key urban facilities within this right-of-way in accordance with City Standards, something that the applicant
has shown as a feasible option. The City owned right of way provides a continuous corridor for utilities, transportation,
Fire and existing recreational activity consistent with the Annexation approval criteria in EC 9.7825 (3). Although the
applicant's preferred method would be to have a utility easement through Mr. and Mrs. Holleran's property, they have
the right to deny the applicant's request. Lack of an easement across Mr. Holleran's property is not problematic and
does not preclude the annexation or development of the Furtick property. All key urban services can be provided to the
subject property in an orderly, efficient and timely manner within the City owned right of way consistent with EC
9.7825(3). The City of Eugene's Public Improvement Design Standards Manual requires that all wastewater mains be
within public right-of-way or easements and that they maintain minimum slopes. The City of Eugene allows for private
wastewater laterals to be pumped to the main line if grade is an issue.
Hope this helps. Feel free to contact me with any more questions
Thanks,
Eric Favreau
Civil Engineer 1 1 Direct: (541) 682-2869 City of Eugene I Public Works Engineering
99 E Broadway, Ste. 400 1 Eugene, OR 97401
Attachment F
ranch
( A-
PNGINEERING--
Sinve 19'
January 13, 2017
Nick Gioello
Planning & Development
City of Eugene
99 W 1othAve
Eugene OR 9401
RE: PUBLIC COHNUK14T RESPONSE
FURTICKANNEXAITON (A 1b-io)
Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 16-2C)8:01
Dear Nick,
This letter is to address the confusion Mr. Holleran expressed in his January loth email to
yourself and Councilor Zelenka.
His first point demonstrates a misunderstanding of the Vicinity Map shown on our
mapping. Nowhere do we state that the Vicinity Map represents drivable surface existing on the
ground as Mr. Holleran is asserting. Several years ago our office purchased digital copies of the
Tax Maps from the County Assessor's Office. The Vicinity Map is a clip out of the digital tax map.
The Tax Maps show ownership as reported to the Assessor's Office, not improvements. The city
has reported to the Assessor's Office that they have street right-of-way ownership in the area to
which Mr. Holleran is objecting.
His second point demonstrates confusion on two sub-points. The first sub-point is why
the owners representative approached him about swapping the existing access easement for a
utility easement. The intent was an attempt at being neighborly by proposing an idea that could
be seen as a positive for both parties. Mr. Holleran and his wife would no longer have the risk of
a driveway being constructed in their side yard. The site would gain flexibility for utility
connections. However, since Mr. Holleran has been difficult to contact we have chosen to proceed
without the additional flexibility and leave the driveway easement intact. Mr. Holleran seems to
be expressing confusion though about the fact that this in no way makes the site undevelopable.
The second sub-point is the ability of the city to provide utility connections to the site. The
application material previously submitted demonstrates that this is possible; however, since Mr.
Holleran expressed some difficulty visualizing the discussion, the mapping has been updated to
- - provide a visual of the utility discussion:
EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD SALEM-%n2ER
310 51h Street, Springfield, OR 97477 1 p. 541.746.063' 1 f: 541.746.0389 1 '-ff.v .branchengineering.com
Furtick Annexation (A16-10)
January 13, 2017
Please feel free to let me know if any additional points of confusion arise.
Sincerely,
1-1/9 171
Renee Clough, PLS, PE, AICP
Principal
Branch Engineering Inc.
Branch Engineering, Inc.
Page 2 of 2
n,
m,
GROUND ~
CENTRAL BLVD.,T A ROXN683'
TL 400
0
0
Ln
a
VICINITY MAP
LAND ANNEXATION FOR
FURTICK
NW 114, SEC 9, T18S, R3W, WM
EUGENE, LANE COUNTY, OREGON
JANUARY 12, 2017
"'A'!Y - ' EL 29TH AVE.
ELEVATICH
FPROX. 730•:.<~:..~:
TL 301
TL 10n
LEGEND
CRY LIMRE
D
LANDS TO EE ANNEXED
EXIST ELECTRIC LINE
- ; ! S' -
EXIST. WATER MAIN
EYST. WASTEWATER SEWER
WNHOLE AND "NONE
-E-
ELECTRIC LINE DISC I=D
W WRITTEN STATEMENT
C-WW-
WASTEWATER SEWER NN-
LINE AND WNNOLE
OESCFISED IN WRNTEN
STATEMENT
TL 303
NOTES
NLNDRKIC'~ I. CITY LIMITS BOUNDARIES SHOWN PER
PARK MIN THE CITY IF EUGENE ON-LINE
x5" { INTERACTNE 20NING WP ON
,I OCTOBER 6. 2016.
2 SITE IS CURRENTLY MCANT.
J. NO EASEMENT OR OTHER RECORDED
FESIRICTIONS ARE KNOWN TO EMT
ON THE SITE.
a
`3m.ur ,
=ranch
a_
GINEERING=
77
o lac
NOT TO SCAL£ SCALE. I'=100' .
c': \2JI fi'~I 29fi Furl,k\Annevotian TL 500\I6-298 Pnne..Owq SPIED 1112;2017 1'':S, AM RENEE-