My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Referral Comments (2)
>
OnTrack
>
TIA
>
2016
>
TIA 16-7
>
Referral Comments (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2017 12:33:14 PM
Creation date
1/27/2017 1:12:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
TIA
File Year
16
File Sequence Number
7
Application Name
Amazon Corner
Document Type
Referral Comments
Document_Date
1/9/2017
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
classification map. It is currently developed with 2 travel lanes in each direction, <br />landscaped medians with turn pockets, sidewalks, street lights, curbs and drainage <br />controls. The posted speed of Hilyard Street is 30 mph. The Amazon multi-use path runs <br />adjacent and parallel to Hilyard Street on the west the vehicular way. The Amazon Path <br />transitions into a wide sidewalk along Hilyard Street at approximately the intersection of <br />Hilyard Street and 32nd Ave. The site is bounded to the south by the public right of way <br />of 32nd Ave. 32nd Ave is classified as a local street. It is currently developed with a travel <br />lane in each direction, traffic calming measures (speed humps), sidewalks, street lights, <br />curbs and drainage controls. The intersection of 32nd is also channelized with strip left <br />and right turn movements. The posted speed of 32nd Ave is 25 mph. All abutting streets <br />are developed to urban standards. <br />The site currently has 3 points of access to the public street system. Two along Hilyard <br />Street and 1 along 32nd Ave. The application proposes to keep the northerly driveway on <br />Hilyard Street and the access to 32nd Ave. The proposed driveway on Hilyard Street will <br />be shifted slightly to the south. The driveway will be right in right out operation created <br />by the presence of the existing raised landscape median in Hilyard Street. The slight shift <br />to the south will enhance and reinforce the access restriction. The traffic study did not <br />identify any operational or safety issues with the proposed driveway location to Hilyard <br />Street. The proposed access to 32nd Ave is located at the extreme east side of the <br />development site and located the furthest distance from the Amazon & 32nd Ave <br />intersection as possible. The proposed driveway will be full access with no restrictions. <br />The traffic study did not identify any operational or safety issues with the proposed <br />driveway location to 32nd Ave. The application proposes to close the 2nd driveway on <br />Hilyard. The proposed driveway locations are in conformance with the access <br />management standards established by EC 7.408 through 7.420. The proposed parking lot <br />provides efficient internal circulation routes and minimizes the need to utilize the public <br />street system for circulation. Queue lengths are not excessive and do not have a negative <br />effect on the safety and operations of the adjacent public street system. <br />The proposed development will generate 57 trips during the AM peak hour of the <br />adjacent street and 132 trips during the PM peak hour of the adjacent street. PM Peak <br />hour of the adjacent street is the approved analyses period for the study area per the <br />approved TIA scope of work. AM peak hour of the generator and AM peak hour of the <br />adjacent street trip generation was provided in a supplement memo was provided to <br />address the discrepancy of not including any AM analyses during the AM peak hour of <br />the adjacent street. This is due to the low trip generation rate for the proposed uses <br />during the AM peak hour of the adjacent street. The 57 trips did not warrant any off-site <br />analyses in the study are due because they did not exceed the 50 trip threshold for <br />warranting additional analyses. Therefore AM level of service analyses was not required. <br />The applicants engineer provided level of service analyses for the approved study area <br />intersections, during the approved analyses periods in accordance with the standards of <br />Traffic Impact Analysis, ITE methodology and the Highway Capacity Manual analytics. . <br />Traffic counts, trip generation, distribution and assignment were all performed in <br />accordance with project scoping, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) standards <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.