shows the street and sidewalk which are two different prescriptive easements on the front of Appellant's <br />property. Without established compliance with the requirements of the act of Congress, September 27, 1850 that <br />the properties be surveyed; what evidence does the City have for those shown on the plot plan are the true <br />property lines for Appellant's property? <br />On Issue 2 there are two certified copies of United States land patents that show they can be traced back to <br />Appellant's title as shown on the land maps of the BLM office that lists the transfer of title as to the "assigns <br />forever" like the Appellant here, as specifically stated in the text of the land patents as shown in Attachment B. <br />On Issue 3 Appellant is of the understanding and belief that the City of Eugene current plan is not in compliance <br />with the act of Congress known as the Endangered Species Act, nor has the City of Eugene purported to provide <br />any listed schedule of compliance for the act. Attachment C shows the entire City of Eugene is an area of <br />habitat for the threatened Oregon Spotted Frog. Appellant asks the City provide any evidence of compliance <br />with that act of Congress in advance of any hearing on this matter. <br />ppl, <br />Michael E. Boyd President, CARE <br />Californians for Renewable Energy, Inc. (CARE) <br />5439 Soquel Drive <br />Soquel, CA 95073 <br />Phone: (408) 891-9677 <br />E-mail: boyd.michaele@gmail.com <br />January 23, 2017 <br />