My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comment
>
OnTrack
>
TIA
>
2016
>
TIA 16-7
>
Public Comment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2017 12:30:41 PM
Creation date
1/12/2017 11:35:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
TIA
File Year
16
File Sequence Number
7
Application Name
Amazon Corner
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
1/12/2017
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
regarding the applicability of EC 9.8670(3). Please keep in mind that our prior <br />comments have requested an expanded study area to include more nearby <br />intersections and neighborhood streets than have been evaluated in the <br />Applicant's original TIA. This larger study area should be the basis for applying EC <br />9.8670(2) and (3). The specific code language states that it must include the <br />roadway system "in the vicinity of the development." <br />Trip Generation Estimate Too Low <br />The Applicant uses a "specialty retail center" designation to model trip generation <br />from the 14,000 square feet of retail space. This designation is Land Use #826 in <br />the ITE Trip Generation Manual and it appears to be the lowest trip generation <br />category of all the possible commercial uses that could locate in the proposed <br />development. Many other possible commercial uses would generate considerably <br />more trips. We believe the assumption that all commercial space will conform to <br />the low trip generation rate of the "specialty retail" designation is unrealistic. <br />Other possible commercial/retail uses could generate two to ten times more <br />trips. These include: <br />• Fast food restaurant <br />• Convenience market <br />• Coffee/donut shop/bakery <br />• Cafe/quality restaurant <br />• Office/professional services <br />All of the above uses also generate AM peak trips that will coincide with the <br />existing morning rush hour. Unless the Applicant proposes to ban all the <br />above uses and forbid all commercial tenants from operating or receiving <br />deliveries before 9am, a more-realistic mix of commercial/retail land use <br />designations should be assumed for the purpose of accurately estimating <br />trip generation. All AM commercial trips should be assumed to coincide <br />with the existing AM peak. <br />Evidence of Bicycle Safety Concerns in Area <br />The photo below in Figure 1 is submitted as documented evidence of the bicycle <br />and pedestrian safety concerns referred to in EC 9.8670(2). The bike crossing of <br />Hilyard Street was witnessed during a brief site visit on December 31, 2016. This <br />photo looks westward and shows the southwest corner of the subject property <br />Fodor & Associates - Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.